Literature DB >> 16762822

The identification of small supernumerary marker chromosomes; the experiences of 15,792 fetal karyotyping from Turkey.

Birsen Karaman1, Melike Aytan, Kader Yilmaz, Guven Toksoy, Ebru Perim Onal, Asadollah Ghanbari, Ayse Engur, Hulya Kayserili, Memnune Yuksel-Apak, Seher Basaran.   

Abstract

Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) are often associated with developmental abnormalities and malformations are de novo in approximately 60% of the cases. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques using various probes provided the possibility to analyze and characterize sSMCs, which is highly important for prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling. We now present the establishment of a specific strategy to identify the origin and structure of the sSMCs using a combination of conventional banding and classical FISH techniques. Based on this strategy, in a series of 15,792 prenatal karyotypes, 20 cases with sSMCs (prevalence 1.26 per 1000) were diagnosed. Eighteen of these cases were completely analyzed by FISH using commercial probes and Chromoprobe Multiprobe-I System. Out of 20 sSMCs 12 were satellited (10 bisatellited and two monosatellited) (60%) and eight were non-satellited (six ring-like and two isochromosomes) (40%). sSMCs were mostly derived from chromosome 15 (10/20) (50%). Euchromatin material was found in 13 cases by various banding and FISH techniques, while in six of 20 sSMCs there was no evidence of euchromatin material. Parental karyotypes could be evaluated in 15 cases and familial inheritance was found in only three of them (20%). We conclude that the proposed strategy for the identification and characterization of sSMCs is accurate and represents a good alternative to novel FISH techniques for modestly equipped cytogenetic laboratories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16762822     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2005.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Med Genet        ISSN: 1769-7212            Impact factor:   2.708


  5 in total

1.  Mechanisms and consequences of small supernumerary marker chromosomes: from Barbara McClintock to modern genetic-counseling issues.

Authors:  Erin L Baldwin; Lorraine F May; April N Justice; Christa L Martin; David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Supernumerary marker chromosome 15 in a male with azoospermia and open bite deformity.

Authors:  Altuğ Koç; S Odül Onur; Mehmet Ali Ergün; E Ferda Perçin
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 3.  Chromosome 5 derived small supernumerary marker: towards a genotype/phenotype correlation of proximal chromosome 5 imbalances.

Authors:  Joana Barbosa Melo; Liesbeth Backx; Joris R Vermeesch; Heloisa G Santos; Ana C Sousa; Nadezda Kosyakova; Anja Weise; Ferdinand von Eggeling; Thomas Liehr; Isabel Marques Carreira
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for rapid distinction between unique sequence positive and negative marker chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Diane Van Opstal; Marjan Boter; Petra Noomen; Malgorzata Srebniak; Guus Hamers; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Rare chromosome abnormalities, prevalence and prenatal diagnosis rates from population-based congenital anomaly registers in Europe.

Authors:  Diana Wellesley; Helen Dolk; Patricia A Boyd; Ruth Greenlees; Martin Haeusler; Vera Nelen; Ester Garne; Babak Khoshnood; Berenice Doray; Anke Rissmann; Carmel Mullaney; Elisa Calzolari; Marian Bakker; Joaquin Salvador; Marie-Claude Addor; Elizabeth Draper; Judith Rankin; David Tucker
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.246

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.