Literature DB >> 16762572

The sustained benefits of long-term neurostimulation in patients with refractory chest pain and normal coronary arteries.

Jessica de Vries1, Mike J L Dejongste, Ans Durenkamp, Felix Zijlstra, Michiel J Staal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term efficacy of neurostimulation for treating refractory angina pectoris-like chest pain, we followed patients, treated with either transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) or spinal cord stimulation (SCS).
METHODS: Neurostimulation was judged successful and subsequently continued when initial pain was reduced at least 50%. All patients started with TENS, but if skin irritation occurred during TENS, a SCS system was implanted. The quality of life was measured at baseline and follow-up with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Additional information was gathered concerning anti-anginal medication, complaints, and physical condition.
RESULTS: Of 36 patients treated successfully with neurostimulation, we identified 24 patients after a mean (SD) follow-up period of 5.08 (3.86) years; 12 patients dropped out of the study. In 13 of the remaining 24 patients, TENS induced skin irritation. Eight of these 13 patients received successful SCS, while five refused implantation. In the 24 patients, a mean pain reduction of 57% was achieved in conjunction with an increased exercise capacity of 30% and walking distance increased from 0.73 (0.83) to 1.62 (1.62) (p=0.018). Within the Seattle Angina Questionnaire the domain 'disease perception' improved from 38.89 (16.61) to 49.31 (21.83) (p=0.004), the domain 'physical limitation' improved from 29.89 (15.10) to 40.97 (22.63) (p=0.001) and 'anginal frequency' improved from 41.67 (24.08) to 55.00 (23.03) (p=0.005). In addition, nitroglycerin consumption was reduced from 7.85 (8.49) to 1.98 (2.19) (p=0.001).
CONCLUSION: Neurostimulation techniques should thus be of widespread value for treating angina pectoris-like chest pain in patients who are refractory to medication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16762572     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pain        ISSN: 1090-3801            Impact factor:   3.931


  8 in total

1.  Neuromodulation of thoracic intraspinal visceroreceptive transmission by electrical stimulation of spinal dorsal column and somatic afferents in rats.

Authors:  Chao Qin; Jay P Farber; Bengt Linderoth; Abdul Shahid; R D Foreman
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 5.820

2.  Angina in Women without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Kamakki Banks; Monica Lo; Amit Khera
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2010-02

3.  Long-term follow-up of patients with cardiac syndrome X treated by spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Gregory Angelo Sgueglia; Alfonso Sestito; Antonella Spinelli; Beatrice Cioni; Fabio Infusino; Fabio Papacci; Fulvio Bellocci; Mario Meglio; Filippo Crea; Gaetano Antonio Lanza
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  The Central Nervous System and Psychosocial Factors in Primary Microvascular Angina.

Authors:  Mattia Cattaneo; Geza Halasz; Magdalena Maria Cattaneo; Adel Younes; Camilla Gallino; Isabella Sudano; Augusto Gallino
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-13

Review 5.  Cardiac Syndrome X: update 2014.

Authors:  Shilpa Agrawal; Puja K Mehta; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 2.213

6.  Effect of spinal cord stimulation on cardiac adrenergic nerve function in patients with cardiac syndrome X.

Authors:  Antonella Spinelli; Gaetano A Lanza; Maria Lucia Calcagni; Alfonso Sestito; Gregory A Sgueglia; Antonio Di Monaco; Isabella Bruno; Priscilla Lamendola; Lucy Barone; Alessandro Giordano; Filippo Crea
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Long-term prognosis of patients with cardiac syndrome X: a review.

Authors:  I A C Vermeltfoort; G J J Teule; A B van Dijk; H J Muntinga; P G H M Raijmakers
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 8.  Electrical epidural stimulation of the cervical spinal cord: implications for spinal respiratory neuroplasticity after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ian G Malone; Rachel L Nosacka; Marissa A Nash; Kevin J Otto; Erica A Dale
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.974

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.