BACKGROUND: Impulsivity, a core feature of bipolar disorder (BD), is a multifaceted concept encompassing failure of response inhibition and poor decision-making. Abnormalities in these two cognitive domains have been reported in BD patients but their relationship with impulsivity has not been explored. METHODS: Twenty-five remitted patients with BD completed the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) and performed the Hayling Sentence Completion Task (HSCT) and a computerized version of the Iowa Gambling task. The HSCT total errors scaled score was used as a measure of response inhibition while the gabling task score, which reflects participants' ability to make advantageous choices, was used a measure of decision making. RESULTS: Higher scores on the BIS attentional and non-planning subscales were respectively associated with more errors in the HSCT and less advantageous choices in the gambling task. LIMITATIONS: All patients were medicated. Healthy participants were not included. CONCLUSIONS: Viewed in the context of recent relevant studies our findings suggest that impulsivity, response inhibition and decision-making in BD may represent behavioural manifestations of the same underlying biological mechanism possibly linked to ventral prefrontal cortical function.
BACKGROUND: Impulsivity, a core feature of bipolar disorder (BD), is a multifaceted concept encompassing failure of response inhibition and poor decision-making. Abnormalities in these two cognitive domains have been reported in BD patients but their relationship with impulsivity has not been explored. METHODS: Twenty-five remitted patients with BD completed the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) and performed the Hayling Sentence Completion Task (HSCT) and a computerized version of the Iowa Gambling task. The HSCT total errors scaled score was used as a measure of response inhibition while the gabling task score, which reflects participants' ability to make advantageous choices, was used a measure of decision making. RESULTS: Higher scores on the BIS attentional and non-planning subscales were respectively associated with more errors in the HSCT and less advantageous choices in the gambling task. LIMITATIONS: All patients were medicated. Healthy participants were not included. CONCLUSIONS: Viewed in the context of recent relevant studies our findings suggest that impulsivity, response inhibition and decision-making in BD may represent behavioural manifestations of the same underlying biological mechanism possibly linked to ventral prefrontal cortical function.
Authors: Michael A Cerullo; Caleb M Adler; Martine Lamy; James C Eliassen; David E Fleck; Stephen M Strakowski; Melissa P DelBello Journal: Early Interv Psychiatry Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 2.732
Authors: Morgane Milienne-Petiot; James P Kesby; Mary Graves; Jordy van Enkhuizen; Svetlana Semenova; Arpi Minassian; Athina Markou; Mark A Geyer; Jared W Young Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Giovanni Abbate-Daga; Sara Buzzichelli; Federico Amianto; Giuseppe Rocca; Enrica Marzola; Shawn M McClintock; Secondo Fassino Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2011-10-07 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Michael S McCloskey; Antonia S New; Larry J Siever; Marianne Goodman; Harold W Koenigsberg; Janine D Flory; Emil F Coccaro Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2009-02-18 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Thelma Schilt; Anneke E Goudriaan; Maarten W Koeter; Wim van den Brink; Ben Schmand Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2008-11-20 Impact factor: 4.530