Literature DB >> 16761791

Accreditation in European health care.

Charles D Shaw1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the past 15 years many countries, with widely differing health systems, have established national accreditation programs. A European survey report on accreditation, which includes data and updates from 2003 that were submitted between January and October 2004, is summarized.
METHODS: A one-page questionnaire was circulated, with the summary of the 2002 survey, in February 2004 to known contacts in 44 of the larger states in the European Region of the World Health Organization. Combining the surveys of 2000, 2002, and 2004, responses were received from 36 of the 44 larger countries of the European Region from which information was sought.
FINDINGS: The number of national accreditation programs for health services has continued to grow since the mid-1990s. By 2004, 26 programs were active or in development in 18 countries. The "English-speaking" model of North America remains the leading influence; however, newer programs are increasingly influenced by other models. Governmental programs are more likely to publish findings of accreditation assessments, and more recent programs are more likely to make results public. DISCUSSION: Accreditation programs are being set up more frequently in Europe than anywhere else; the trend is from voluntary, confidential, and self-financed organizational development toward benign but transparent regulation of stakeholders, governmental support, and public funding. Programs vary widely, yet patient and staff mobility, cross-border purchasing, freedom of trade, and protection of public safety and patients' rights imply the need for a common approach to definition, assessment, and improvement of standards in health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16761791     DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(06)32035-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf        ISSN: 1553-7250


  5 in total

1.  Practice accreditation: the European perspective.

Authors:  Helen E Lester; Tina Eriksson; Rob Dijkstra; Katrin Martinson; Tomasz Tomasik; Nigel Sparrow
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Which way to organizational excellence? Not this way; ask a professional.

Authors:  Charles D Shaw
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Impact of accreditation on documentation and staff perception in the ophthalmology department of an Indian medical college.

Authors:  K Ajay; Avinash Poka; M Narayan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Impact of peer-led quality improvement networks on quality of inpatient mental health care: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lina Aimola; Sarah Jasim; Neeraj Tripathi; Sarah Tucker; Adrian Worrall; Alan Quirk; Mike J Crawford
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.630

5.  The survey visit as a key evaluative event in accreditation-a qualitative study of survey visit experiences among surveyors and general practice professionals.

Authors:  Tina Drud Due; Thorkil Thorsen; Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 2.497

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.