Literature DB >> 16761596

Interactions between wave action and grazing control the distribution of intertidal macroalgae.

Per R Jonsson1, Lena Granhag, Paula S Moschella, Per Aberg, Stephen J Hawkins, Richard C Thompson.   

Abstract

Canopy-forming macroalgae are key species on temperate rocky shores. However, there is a lack of understanding of how the relative balance of physical and biological factors controls the establishment and persistence of intertidal macroalgae. Here we present an integrated study of the relative importance of wave-induced forces and grazing for the recruitment and survival of the canopy-forming intertidal macroalgae Fucus vesiculosus and F. spiralis. A set of overtopped breakwaters provided a nearly unconfounded gradient in wave exposure between seaward and landward sides. A biomechanical analysis was performed based on empirical measurements of maximum drag forces in breaking waves, a model of long-term maximum wave height, and the breaking stress of Fucus spp. The estimated maximum flow speed (7-8 m/s) on the seaward side of the breakwaters was predicted to completely dislodge or prune Fucus spp. larger than approximately 10 cm, while dislodgment was highly unlikely on the landward side for all sizes. Experimental transplantation of Fucus spp. supported the biomechanical analysis but also suggested that mechanical abrasion may further limit survival in wave-exposed locations. Experimental removal of the limpet Patella vulgata, which was the principal grazer at this site, resulted in recruitment of Fucus spp. on the seaward side. We present a model of limpet grazing that indicates that limpet densities >5-20 individuals/m2 provide a proximate mechanism preventing establishment of Fucus spp., whereas wave action >2 m/s reduces persistence through dislodgment and battering. In a conceptual model we further propose that recruitment and survival of juvenile Fucus spp. are controlled indirectly by wave exposure through higher limpet densities at exposed locations. This model predicts that climate change, and in particular an increased frequency of storm events in the northeast Atlantic, will restrict fucoids to more sheltered locations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16761596     DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1169:ibwaag]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  6 in total

1.  Higher resistance to herbivory in introduced compared to native populations of a seaweed.

Authors:  Helena Forslund; Sofia A Wikström; Henrik Pavia
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-09-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Effect of water motion and microhabitat preferences on spatio-temporal variation of epiphytic communities: a case study in an artificial rocky reef system, Laoshan Bay, China.

Authors:  Xiaolong Yang; Hongbin Lv; Wentao Li; Meiyu Guo; Xiumei Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Facilitative Effect of a Generalist Herbivore on the Recovery of a Perennial Alga: Consequences for Persistence at the Edge of Their Geographic Range.

Authors:  Moisés A Aguilera; Nelson Valdivia; Bernardo R Broitman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Climate change impact on seaweed meadow distribution in the North Atlantic rocky intertidal.

Authors:  Alexander Jueterbock; Lennert Tyberghein; Heroen Verbruggen; James A Coyer; Jeanine L Olsen; Galice Hoarau
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Herbivore-Alga Interaction Strength Influences Spatial Heterogeneity in a Kelp-Dominated Intertidal Community.

Authors:  Moisés A Aguilera; Nelson Valdivia; Bernardo R Broitman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Non-linear interactions between consumers and flow determine the probability of plant community dominance on Maine rocky shores.

Authors:  Brian R Silliman; Michael W McCoy; Geoffrey C Trussell; Caitlin M Crain; Patrick J Ewanchuk; Mark D Bertness
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.