Literature DB >> 16761586

The use of genetic clines to estimate dispersal distances of marine larvae.

Erik E Sotka1, Stephen R Palumbi.   

Abstract

Many unresolved issues in the ecology and evolution of marine populations center on how far planktonic larvae disperse away from their parents. Genetic tools provide a promising way to define the spatial spread of larvae, yet their accurate interpretation depends on the extent to which genetic loci are under selection. Genetic clines, geographic zones in which genetically differentiated populations interbreed, provide opportunities to explicitly and simultaneously quantify the relative roles of selection and dispersal. Here, we review the theory and analysis of genetic clines and apply these techniques to published studies of multilocus clines in the sea. The geographic width of a stable genetic cline is determined by a balance between the homogenizing effects of dispersal and the diversifying effects of selection. For marine researchers, the power of genetic clines is that, if selection and clinal width are quantified, then the average geographic distances that larvae move can be inferred. Measuring selection or dispersal through laboratory or field-based experimentation is possible, though logistically difficult, for pelagically dispersed organisms. Instead, dispersal may be more robustly quantified from the degree of linkage disequilibrium between two or more loci, because linkage disequilibrium integrates selection across multiple life stages and generations. It is also relatively insensitive to whether exogenous or endogenous selection operates. Even without quantifying linkage disequilibrium, the theory of genetic clines indicates that the average dispersal distance of larvae is a fraction (i.e., generally <35%) of the clinal width. Because cline theory is based on several underlying assumptions, including near-equilibrium between selection and migration, the dispersal distances inferred from empirical data should be of the correct order but may not be precise. Even so, such estimates of larval dispersal are valuable, as they can be utilized to design appropriate scales for future investigations and provide some guidance to conservation efforts.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16761586     DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1094:tuogct]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  17 in total

Review 1.  The dynamics of biogeographic ranges in the deep sea.

Authors:  Craig R McClain; Sarah Mincks Hardy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The combination of selection and dispersal helps explain genetic structure in intertidal mussels.

Authors:  G I Zardi; K R Nicastro; C D McQuaid; L Hancke; B Helmuth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  A tale of two haplotype groups: Evaluating the New World Junonia ring species hypothesis using the distribution of divergent COI haplotypes.

Authors:  Amber P Gemmell; Jeffrey M Marcus
Journal:  Syst Entomol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.844

4.  Can the source-sink hypothesis explain macrofaunal abundance patterns in the abyss? A modelling test.

Authors:  Sarah M Hardy; Craig R Smith; Andreas M Thurnherr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The genetic architecture of hybridisation between two lineages of greenshell mussels.

Authors:  J P A Gardner; K-J Wei
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Evidence for a bimodal distribution of hybrid indices in a hybrid zone with high admixture.

Authors:  Jessica L McKenzie; Rashpal S Dhillon; Patricia M Schulte
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Genetic structure among 50 species of the northeastern Pacific rocky intertidal community.

Authors:  Ryan P Kelly; Stephen R Palumbi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Can diversifying selection be distinguished from history in geographic clines? A population genomic study of killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus).

Authors:  Allan E Strand; Larissa M Williams; Marjorie F Oleksiak; Erik E Sotka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Using neutral, selected, and hitchhiker loci to assess connectivity of marine populations in the genomic era.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexandre Gagnaire; Thomas Broquet; Didier Aurelle; Frédérique Viard; Ahmed Souissi; François Bonhomme; Sophie Arnaud-Haond; Nicolas Bierne
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  Role of upwelling on larval dispersal and productivity of gooseneck barnacle populations in the Cantabrian Sea: management implications.

Authors:  Antonella Rivera; Nicolás Weidberg; Antonio F Pardiñas; Ricardo González-Gil; Lucía García-Flórez; J L Acuña
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.