Literature DB >> 16761136

Bone conducted vibration selectively activates irregular primary otolithic vestibular neurons in the guinea pig.

Ian S Curthoys1, Juno Kim, Samara K McPhedran, Aaron J Camp.   

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to determine whether bone-conducted vibration (BCV) is equally effective in activating both semicircular canal and otolith afferents in the guinea pig or whether there is preferential activation of one of these classes of vestibular afferents. To answer this question a large number (346) of single primary vestibular neurons were recorded extracellularly in anesthetized guinea pigs and were identified by their location in the vestibular nerve and classed as regular or irregular on the basis of the variability of their spontaneous discharge. If a neuron responded to angular acceleration it was classed as a semicircular canal neuron, if it responded to maintained roll or pitch tilts it was classified as an otolith neuron. Each neuron was then tested by BCV stimuli-either clicks, continuous pure tones (200-1,500 Hz) or short tone bursts (500 Hz lasting 7 ms)-delivered by a B-71 clinical bone-conduction oscillator cemented to the guinea pig's skull. All stimulus intensities were referred to that animal's own auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold to BCV clicks, and the maximum intensity used was within the animal's physiological range and was usually around 70 dB above BCV threshold. In addition two sensitive single axis linear accelerometers cemented to the skull gave absolute values of the stimulus acceleration in the rostro-caudal direction. The criterion for a neuron being classed as activated was an audible, stimulus-locked increase in firing rate (a 10% change was easily detectable) in response to the BCV stimulus. At the stimulus levels used in this study, semicircular canal neurons, both regular and irregular, were insensitive to BCV stimuli and very few responded: only nine of 189 semicircular canal neurons tested (4.7%) showed a detectable increase in firing in response to BCV stimuli up to the maximum 2 V peak-to-peak level we delivered to the B-71 oscillator (which produced a peak-to-peak skull acceleration of around 6-8 g and was usually around 60-70 dB above the animal's own ABR threshold for BCV clicks). Regular otolithic afferents likewise had a poor response; only 14 of 99 tested (14.1%) showed any increase in firing rate up to the maximum BCV stimulus level. However, most irregular otolithic afferents (82.8%) showed a clear increase in firing rate in response to BCV stimuli: of the 58 irregular otolith neurons tested, 48 were activated, with some being activated at very low intensities (only about 10 dB above the animal's ABR threshold to BCV clicks). Most of the activated otolith afferents were in the superior division of the vestibular nerve and were probably utricular afferents. That was confirmed by evidence using juxtacellular injection of neurobiotin near BCV activated neurons to trace their site of origin to the utricular macula. We conclude there is a very clear preference for irregular otolith afferents to be activated selectively by BCV stimuli at low stimulus levels and that BCV stimuli activate some utricular irregular afferent neurons. The BCV generates compressional and shear waves, which travel through the skull and constitute head accelerations, which are sufficient to stimulate the most sensitive otolithic receptor cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16761136     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0544-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  38 in total

1.  Functional characterization of primary vestibular afferents in the frog.

Authors:  R H Blanks; W Precht
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1976-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Responses of squirrel monkey vestibular neurons to audio-frequency sound and head vibration.

Authors:  E D Young; C Fernández; J M Goldberg
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  Convergence of labyrinthine influences on units in the vestibular nuclei of the cat. I. Natural stimulation.

Authors:  I S Curthoys; C H Markham
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1971-12-24       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Vestibular primary afferent activity in an in vitro preparation of the mouse inner ear.

Authors:  Heung-Youp Lee; Aaron J Camp; Robert J Callister; Alan M Brichta
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. III. Response dynamics.

Authors:  C Fernández; J M Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. II. Directional selectivity and force-response relations.

Authors:  C Fernández; J M Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Acoustically responsive fibers in the vestibular nerve of the cat.

Authors:  M P McCue; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Scarpa's ganglion in the rat and guinea pig.

Authors:  I S Curthoys
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  Acoustic responses of vestibular afferents in a model of superior canal dehiscence.

Authors:  John P Carey; Timo P Hirvonen; Timothy E Hullar; Lloyd B Minor
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Golgi-like labeling of a single neuron recorded extracellularly.

Authors:  D Pinault
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1994-04-11       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  65 in total

1.  Lack of otolith involvement in balance responses evoked by mastoid electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Omar S Mian; Christopher J Dakin; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Richard C Fitzpatrick; Brian L Day
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  [Recording cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Part 2: influencing factors, evaluation of findings and clinical significance].

Authors:  L E Walther; K Hörmann; O Pfaar
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  An animal model of ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Ting-Hua Yang; Shing-Hwa Liu; Shou-Jen Wang; Yi-Ho Young
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Vestibular primary afferent responses to sound and vibration in the guinea pig.

Authors:  Ian S Curthoys; Vedran Vulovic
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  [Recording cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: part 1: anatomy, physiology, methods and normal findings].

Authors:  L E Walther; K Hörmann; O Pfaar
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Waiting for the evidence: VEMP testing and the ability to differentiate utricular versus saccular function.

Authors:  Miriam S Welgampola; John P Carey
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Objective measures of vestibular function during an acute vertigo attack in a very young child.

Authors:  L Manzari; A M Burgess; H G Macdougall; I S Curthoys
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  The quantal component of synaptic transmission from sensory hair cells to the vestibular calyx.

Authors:  Stephen M Highstein; Mary Anne Mann; Gay R Holstein; Richard D Rabbitt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The human sound-evoked vestibulo-ocular reflex and its electromyographic correlate.

Authors:  Miriam S Welgampola; Americo A Migliaccio; Oluwaseun A Myrie; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Perception of threshold-level whole-body motion during mechanical mastoid vibration.

Authors:  Rakshatha Kabbaligere; Charles S Layne; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.435

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.