Beata Y Silber1, Rodney J Croft, Katherine Papafotiou, Con Stough. 1. Drugs and Driving Research Unit, Brain Sciences Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, 400 Burwood Rd, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia. bsilber@swin.edu.au
Abstract
RATIONALE: It is not clear how the deleterious effects of amphetamines on driving performance are mediated in terms of select cognitive processes. OBJECTIVES: The current three separate experiments assessed the acute effects of an oral dose of either 0.42-mg/kg d-amphetamine, d,l-methamphetamine and d-methamphetamine on driving-related cognitive functions in a total of 60 healthy non-fatigued adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three separate repeated measures counterbalanced, double-blind, placebo-controlled designs were employed in which 20 volunteers completed two treatment conditions, eitherd-amphetamine, d,l-methamphetamine or d-methamphetamine and placebo. Performance was assessed on a range of attentional, psychomotor and perceptual speed tasks. RESULTS:Mean blood concentrations at 120-, 170- and 240-min postdrug administration were 83, 98 and 96 ng/ml, respectively, for d-amphetamine, 90, 95 and 105 ng/ml, respectively, for d,l-methamphetamine and 72, 67 and 59 ng/ml, respectively, for d-methamphetamine. The amphetamines, in general, improved various aspects of attention (Digit Vigilance, Digit Symbol Substitution Test and Movement Estimation Performance) with some evidence to suggest possible enhancement in psychomotor functioning (Tracking ability) and perceptual speed (Inspection Time). CONCLUSIONS: The current series of studies primarily provides evidence of low-level amphetamine-related enhancement of function; however, it also provides evidence of less conservative movement estimation that might contribute to amphetamine-related road fatalities.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: It is not clear how the deleterious effects of amphetamines on driving performance are mediated in terms of select cognitive processes. OBJECTIVES: The current three separate experiments assessed the acute effects of an oral dose of either 0.42-mg/kg d-amphetamine, d,l-methamphetamine and d-methamphetamine on driving-related cognitive functions in a total of 60 healthy non-fatigued adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three separate repeated measures counterbalanced, double-blind, placebo-controlled designs were employed in which 20 volunteers completed two treatment conditions, either d-amphetamine, d,l-methamphetamine or d-methamphetamine and placebo. Performance was assessed on a range of attentional, psychomotor and perceptual speed tasks. RESULTS: Mean blood concentrations at 120-, 170- and 240-min postdrug administration were 83, 98 and 96 ng/ml, respectively, for d-amphetamine, 90, 95 and 105 ng/ml, respectively, for d,l-methamphetamine and 72, 67 and 59 ng/ml, respectively, for d-methamphetamine. The amphetamines, in general, improved various aspects of attention (Digit Vigilance, Digit Symbol Substitution Test and Movement Estimation Performance) with some evidence to suggest possible enhancement in psychomotor functioning (Tracking ability) and perceptual speed (Inspection Time). CONCLUSIONS: The current series of studies primarily provides evidence of low-level amphetamine-related enhancement of function; however, it also provides evidence of less conservative movement estimation that might contribute to amphetamine-related road fatalities.
Authors: J Cobb Scott; Steven Paul Woods; Georg E Matt; Rachel A Meyer; Robert K Heaton; J Hampton Atkinson; Igor Grant Journal: Neuropsychol Rev Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 7.444
Authors: Kelly-Anne Phillips; Julie Aldridge; Karin Ribi; Zhuoxin Sun; Alastair Thompson; Vernon Harvey; Beat Thürlimann; Fatima Cardoso; Olivia Pagani; Alan S Coates; Aron Goldhirsch; Karen N Price; Richard D Gelber; Jürg Bernhard Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-11-03 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: David Bosanquet; Hamish G Macdougall; Stephen J Rogers; Graham A Starmer; Rebecca McKetin; Alexander Blaszczynski; Iain S McGregor Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2012-07-29 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Marieke E van der Schaaf; Sean J Fallon; Niels Ter Huurne; Jan Buitelaar; Roshan Cools Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2013-04-23 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Marisa E Marraccini; Lisa L Weyandt; Joseph S Rossi; Bergljot Gyda Gudmundsdottir Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 3.157