Literature DB >> 16760974

Decay of aftershock density with distance indicates triggering by dynamic stress.

K R Felzer1, E E Brodsky.   

Abstract

The majority of earthquakes are aftershocks, yet aftershock physics is not well understood. Many studies suggest that static stress changes trigger aftershocks, but recent work suggests that shaking (dynamic stresses) may also play a role. Here we measure the decay of aftershocks as a function of distance from magnitude 2-6 mainshocks in order to clarify the aftershock triggering process. We find that for short times after the mainshock, when low background seismicity rates allow for good aftershock detection, the decay is well fitted by a single inverse power law over distances of 0.2-50 km. The consistency of the trend indicates that the same triggering mechanism is working over the entire range. As static stress changes at the more distant aftershocks are negligible, this suggests that dynamic stresses may be triggering all of these aftershocks. We infer that the observed aftershock density is consistent with the probability of triggering aftershocks being nearly proportional to seismic wave amplitude. The data are not fitted well by models that combine static stress change with the evolution of frictionally locked faults.

Year:  2006        PMID: 16760974     DOI: 10.1038/nature04799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  10 in total

1.  Decay of aftershock density with distance does not indicate triggering by dynamic stress.

Authors:  Keith Richards-Dinger; Ross S Stein; Shinji Toda
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Stress imparted by the great 2004 Sumatra earthquake shut down transforms and activated rifts up to 400 km away in the Andaman Sea.

Authors:  Volkan Sevilgen; Ross S Stein; Fred F Pollitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Triggered dynamics in a model of different fault creep regimes.

Authors:  Srđan Kostić; Igor Franović; Matjaž Perc; Nebojša Vasović; Kristina Todorović
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Anthropogenic triggering of large earthquakes.

Authors:  Francesco Mulargia; Andrea Bizzarri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  SEDA: A software package for the Statistical Earthquake Data Analysis.

Authors:  A M Lombardi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The Relevance of Foreshocks in Earthquake Triggering: A Statistical Study.

Authors:  Eugenio Lippiello; Cataldo Godano; Lucilla de Arcangelis
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.524

7.  Nucleation and Cascade Features of Earthquake Mainshock Statistically Explored from Foreshock Seismicity.

Authors:  Masashi Kamogawa; Kazuyoshi Z Nanjo; Jun Izutsu; Yoshiaki Orihara; Toshiyasu Nagao; Seiya Uyeda
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 2.524

8.  Dynamic earthquake triggering response tracks evolving unrest at Sierra Negra volcano, Galápagos Islands.

Authors:  Andrew F Bell; Stephen Hernandez; John McCloskey; Mario Ruiz; Peter C LaFemina; Christopher J Bean; Martin Möllhoff
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Spatial organization of foreshocks as a tool to forecast large earthquakes.

Authors:  E Lippiello; W Marzocchi; L de Arcangelis; C Godano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Mechanical origin of aftershocks.

Authors:  E Lippiello; F Giacco; W Marzocchi; C Godano; L de Arcangelis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.