Literature DB >> 16760856

Cancer and thromboembolism: from biology to clinics.

R Castelli1, F Porro.   

Abstract

The association between cancer and thromboembolic disease is a well-known phenomenon and can contribute significantly to the morbidity and mortality of cancer patients. Recent studies evidenced that malignant growth has also been linked to activity of heparin-like glycosoaminoglycans, to neoangiogenesis, to protease activity, to immune function and gene expression in addition with activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis. These evidences suggest that antithrombotic drugs may play an additional role in tumour cell growth and in cancer dissemination. The spectrum of thromboembolic manifestations in cancer patients includes deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, but also intravascular disseminated coagulation and abnormalities in the clotting system in the absence of clinical manifestations. Antithrombotic drugs such as unfractioned heparin (UFH) and, particularly, low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) in addition with dicumaroids, are widely used for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic manifestations that commonly accompanies malignancies. The aims of the study are to review the pathogenetic mechanisms of thromboembolic disease in cancer patients, the efficiency of antithrombotic drugs in preventing and treating of cancer related thromboembolic complications and review the thromboprophylaxis strategies to prevent thromboembolic complications of cancer patients. Meta-analyses comparing UFH and LMWH for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis have shown better outcome with reduction of major bleeding complications in patients treated with LMWH. Many studies have demonstrated the efficiency and the safeness of antithrombotic agents in the prophylaxis and in the treatment of thromboembolic complication that accompanies malignancies. Many experimental studies, reviewed in this paper, support the hypothesis that antithrombotic agents, but especially heparins can affect cancer progression in many of the different steps of cancer biology. First of all, due to their anticoagulant effect, antithrombotic agents may interfere with thrombin generation and with fibrin formation induced by cancer cells, thus inhibiting the mechanism of metastasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16760856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Med        ISSN: 0026-4806            Impact factor:   4.806


  2 in total

1.  APT102, a novel adpase, cooperates with aspirin to disrupt bone metastasis in mice.

Authors:  Ozge Uluçkan; Mark C Eagleton; Desiree H Floyd; Elizabeth A Morgan; Angela C Hirbe; Matthew Kramer; Nikki Dowland; Julie L Prior; David Piwnica-Worms; Soon Seog Jeong; Ridong Chen; Katherine Weilbaecher
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 4.429

2.  Predictive score for estimating cancer after venous thromboembolism: a cohort study.

Authors:  Bruno L Ferreyro; Federico Angriman; Diego Giunta; María Lourdes Posadas-Martínez; Fernando Vazquez; Fernán Gonzalez Bernaldo De Quirós; Andre C K B Amaral; Damon C Scales
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 4.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.