BACKGROUND: Although an intermittent antiviral treatment (ART) strategy may limit long-term toxicity and cost, there is concern about the risk for virologic failure, selection of drug resistance mutations, and disease progression. By boosting CD4 T-cell counts, interleukin 2 (IL-2) could safely prolong the duration of treatment interruption (TI) in a CD4-driven strategy. METHODS: The AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) study A5102 evaluated 3 cycles of IL-2 before TI, on clinical and immunologic outcomes, using a CD4 T-cell count of <350 cells/mm as the threshold for restarting ART. Forty-seven HIV-infected subjects on potent ART with CD4 T-cell counts of > or =500 cells/mm or more and HIV RNA levels of less than 200 copies/mL were randomized to arm A (ART + three 5-day cycles of IL-2 at 4.5 million U, Sc, BID every 8 weeks, n = 23) or arm B (ART alone, n = 24) for 18 weeks (step 1). At the end of step 1, subjects with a CD4 T-cell count of > or =500 cells/mm or more stopped ART until a CD4 count of <350 cells/mm (step 2). CD4 T-cell count, time to return of viremia, and the emergence of drug resistance mutations after TI were compared between study arms. RESULTS: IL-2 recipients maintained higher CD4 counts during TI for 48 weeks with a waning of the CD4 effect by 72 weeks. A sustained CD4 T-cell count of more than 350 cells/mm and more durable TI were associated with a higher nadir CD4 T-cell count before ART and higher naive CD4 T-cell count at entry. After TI, a higher viral set point and drug resistance mutations at virologic rebound were associated with a shorter time to CD4 T-cell count of less than 350 cell/mm. There were no differences in the magnitude of virologic rebound (at week 8 of step 2, median log10 HIV RNA level was 4.23 for arm A and 4.21 for arm B) or the steady-state HIV-1 RNA level after week 8. CONCLUSIONS: IL-2 before TI did not prolong time to CD4 of less than 350 cells/mm. A TI strategy utilizing a CD4 T-cell threshold of less than 350 cells/mm for restarting ART appears generally safe with most subjects in both arms remaining off ART for more than 1 year. Implications of our results for TI strategies include the potential advantage of starting ART at higher CD4 T-cell levels while avoiding any drug resistance and evaluating immunomodulators or drugs to reduce T-cell activation and HIV-1 RNA rebound during the TI.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Although an intermittent antiviral treatment (ART) strategy may limit long-term toxicity and cost, there is concern about the risk for virologic failure, selection of drug resistance mutations, and disease progression. By boosting CD4 T-cell counts, interleukin 2 (IL-2) could safely prolong the duration of treatment interruption (TI) in a CD4-driven strategy. METHODS: The AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) study A5102 evaluated 3 cycles of IL-2 before TI, on clinical and immunologic outcomes, using a CD4 T-cell count of <350 cells/mm as the threshold for restarting ART. Forty-seven HIV-infected subjects on potent ART with CD4 T-cell counts of > or =500 cells/mm or more and HIV RNA levels of less than 200 copies/mL were randomized to arm A (ART + three 5-day cycles of IL-2 at 4.5 million U, Sc, BID every 8 weeks, n = 23) or arm B (ART alone, n = 24) for 18 weeks (step 1). At the end of step 1, subjects with a CD4 T-cell count of > or =500 cells/mm or more stopped ART until a CD4 count of <350 cells/mm (step 2). CD4 T-cell count, time to return of viremia, and the emergence of drug resistance mutations after TI were compared between study arms. RESULTS:IL-2 recipients maintained higher CD4 counts during TI for 48 weeks with a waning of the CD4 effect by 72 weeks. A sustained CD4 T-cell count of more than 350 cells/mm and more durable TI were associated with a higher nadir CD4 T-cell count before ART and higher naive CD4 T-cell count at entry. After TI, a higher viral set point and drug resistance mutations at virologic rebound were associated with a shorter time to CD4 T-cell count of less than 350 cell/mm. There were no differences in the magnitude of virologic rebound (at week 8 of step 2, median log10 HIV RNA level was 4.23 for arm A and 4.21 for arm B) or the steady-state HIV-1 RNA level after week 8. CONCLUSIONS:IL-2 before TI did not prolong time to CD4 of less than 350 cells/mm. A TI strategy utilizing a CD4 T-cell threshold of less than 350 cells/mm for restarting ART appears generally safe with most subjects in both arms remaining off ART for more than 1 year. Implications of our results for TI strategies include the potential advantage of starting ART at higher CD4 T-cell levels while avoiding any drug resistance and evaluating immunomodulators or drugs to reduce T-cell activation and HIV-1 RNA rebound during the TI.
Authors: Golnaz Namazi; Jesse M Fajnzylber; Evgenia Aga; Ronald J Bosch; Edward P Acosta; Radwa Sharaf; Wendy Hartogensis; Jeffrey M Jacobson; Elizabeth Connick; Paul Volberding; Daniel Skiest; David Margolis; Michael C Sneller; Susan J Little; Sara Gianella; Davey M Smith; Daniel R Kuritzkes; Roy M Gulick; John W Mellors; Vikram Mehraj; Rajesh T Gandhi; Ronald Mitsuyasu; Robert T Schooley; Keith Henry; Pablo Tebas; Steven G Deeks; Tae-Wook Chun; Ann C Collier; Jean-Pierre Routy; Frederick M Hecht; Bruce D Walker; Jonathan Z Li Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Pablo Tebas; David Stein; Gwendolyn Binder-Scholl; Rithun Mukherjee; Troy Brady; Tessio Rebello; Laurent Humeau; Michael Kalos; Emmanouil Papasavvas; Luis J Montaner; Daniel Schullery; Farida Shaheen; Andrea L Brennan; Zhaohui Zheng; Julio Cotte; Vladimir Slepushkin; Elizabeth Veloso; Adonna Mackley; Wei-Ting Hwang; Faten Aberra; Jenny Zhan; Jean Boyer; Ronald G Collman; Frederic D Bushman; Bruce L Levine; Carl H June Journal: Blood Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Brian O Porter; Kara B Anthony; Jean Shen; Barbara Hahn; Chris E Keh; Frank Maldarelli; William C Blackwelder; Henry Clifford Lane; Joseph A Kovacs; Richard T Davey; Irini Sereti Journal: AIDS Date: 2009-01-14 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Letha M Healey; Barbara K Hahn; Catherine A Rehm; Joseph Adelsberger; Jing Qin; Dean A Follmann; Jorge Tavel; Joseph A Kovacs; Irini Sereti; Richard T Davey Journal: J Interferon Cytokine Res Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 2.607
Authors: Livio Azzoni; Andrea S Foulkes; Emmanouil Papasavvas; Angela M Mexas; Kenneth M Lynn; Karam Mounzer; Pablo Tebas; Jeffrey M Jacobson; Ian Frank; Michael P Busch; Steven G Deeks; Mary Carrington; Una O'Doherty; Jay Kostman; Luis J Montaner Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2012-10-26 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Gregory K Robbins; John G Spritzler; Ellen S Chan; David M Asmuth; Rajesh T Gandhi; Benigno A Rodriguez; Gail Skowron; Paul R Skolnik; Robert W Shafer; Richard B Pollard Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-02-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Jesse Fajnzylber; Radwa Sharaf; John N Hutchinson; Evgenia Aga; Ronald J Bosch; Wendy Hartogensis; Jeffrey M Jacobson; Elizabeth Connick; Paul Volberding; Daniel J Skiest; David Margolis; Michael C Sneller; Susan J Little; Roy M Gulick; John W Mellors; Rajesh T Gandhi; Robert T Schooley; Keith Henry; Pablo Tebas; Steve Deeks; Tae-Wook Chun; Ann C Collier; Frederick M Hecht; Jonathan Z Li Journal: AIDS Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 4.632
Authors: Pablo Tebas; William Keith Henry; Roy Matining; Deborah Weng-Cherng; John Schmitz; Hernan Valdez; Nasreen Jahed; Laurie Myers; William G Powderly; David Katzenstein Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-04-23 Impact factor: 3.240