Literature DB >> 16760546

Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct: 10-year experience of 174 patients from a single centre.

C N Tang1, K K Tsui, J P Y Ha, W T Siu, M K W Li.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct in the management of common bile duct stones.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Regional minimal access surgery training centre in Hong Kong. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct from 1995 to 2005. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic information, reasons for failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and open conversions, and operative morbidity and mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 174 laparoscopic explorations of the common bile duct were performed. Indications for surgery (some overlapping) included: concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones (n=68, 39%) in young persons (<60 years), previously failed endoscopic extraction (n=59, 34%), large (>2 cm) or multiple common bile duct stones (n=40, 23%), and need for laparoscopic bypass to improve bile drainage (n=34, 20%). Mean patient age was 63 (standard deviation, 16) years and 103 were female. Altogether 156 choledochotomies and 18 transcystic duct explorations were performed, with 12 (7%) open conversions. The mean operating time was 129 (standard deviation, 57) minutes. Additional procedures included: 54 laparoscopic operative cholangiographies, 34 laparoscopic biliary bypasses, and 31 instances of adhesiolysis in patients with a history of open upper gastro-intestinal surgery. Complete stone clearance was achieved in 160 (92%) patients. Non-lethal complications occurred in 34 (20%) patients and one died of sepsis after a major bile leak. The mean postoperative stay was 9 (standard deviation, 9) days. Stone recurrence ensued in seven (4%) patients after a mean follow-up of 37 (standard deviation, 29) months.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct is highly successful and can achieve satisfactory ductal clearance even after unsuccessful endoscopic extraction and previous upper gastro-intestinal surgery. In skilled hands, for selected patients laparoscopic bypass can also achieve improved bile drainage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16760546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hong Kong Med J        ISSN: 1024-2708            Impact factor:   2.227


  12 in total

1.  Laparoscopic management of CBD stones: an Indian experience.

Authors:  Jagdish Chander; Anubhav Vindal; Pawanindra Lal; Nikhil Gupta; Vinod Kumar Ramteke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  D Wayne Overby; Keith N Apelgren; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Application of combined rigid choledochoscope and accurate positioning method in the adjuvant treatment of bile duct stones.

Authors:  Ping Wang; Xiaowu Chen; Beiwang Sun; Yanmin Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

4.  Comparison between intraoperative cholangiography and choledochoscopy for ductal clearance in laparoscopic CBD exploration: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Anubhav Vindal; Jagdish Chander; Pawanindra Lal; Balu Mahendra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Management of common bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  A Sharma; P Dahiya; R Khullar; V Soni; M Baijal; P K Chowbey
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 6.  One-stage laproendoscopic procedure versus two-stage procedure in the management for gallstone disease and biliary duct calculi: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pankaj Prasson; Xueli Bai; Qi Zhang; Tingbo Liang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A study of preoperative factors associated with a poor outcome following laparoscopic bile duct exploration.

Authors:  Hamish Noble; Elise Whitley; Sally Norton; Michael Thompson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Common bile duct exploration in an elderly Asian population.

Authors:  Vishal G Shelat; Vincent J M Chia; JeeKeem Low
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-02

9.  Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials with trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Anand Narayan Singh; Ragini Kilambi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Virinder Kumar Bansal; Mahesh C Misra; Karthik Rajan; Ragini Kilambi; Subodh Kumar; Asuri Krishna; Atin Kumar; Chandrakant S Pandav; Rajeshwari Subramaniam; M K Arora; Pramod Kumar Garg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.