Literature DB >> 16760102

Bioethics and deliberative democracy: five warnings from Hobbes.

Griffin Trotter1.   

Abstract

Thomas Hobbes is one of the most ardent and thoroughgoing opponents of participatory democracy among Western political philosophers. Though Hobbes's alternative to participatory democracy-assent by subjects to rule by an absolute sovereign-no longer constitutes a viable political alternative for Westerners, his critique of participatory democracy is a potentially valuable source of insight about its liabilities. This essay elaborates five theses from Hobbes that stand as cogent warnings to those who embrace participatory democracy, especially those (such as most bioethicists) advocating for deliberative democracy based on a rational consensus model. In light of these warnings, the author suggests an alternative, modus vivendi approach to deliberative democracy that would radically alter the current practice of bioethics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Philosophical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16760102     DOI: 10.1080/03605310600712786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  4 in total

1.  Bioethics critically reconsidered: living after foundations.

Authors:  H Tristram Engelhardt
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2012-02

2.  Evidence, ethics and inclusion: a broader base for NICE.

Authors:  Stephen Wilmot
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2011-05

3.  On the anthropological foundation of bioethics: a critique of the work of J.-F. Malherbe.

Authors:  Henri Mbulu
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2013-10

4.  The Place for Religious Content in Clinical Ethics Consultations: A Reply to Janet Malek.

Authors:  Nick Colgrove; Kelly Kate Evans
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2019-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.