Literature DB >> 16760101

Between technocracy and democratic legitimation: a proposed compromise position for common morality public bioethics.

John H Evans1.   

Abstract

In this article I explore the underlying political philosophy of public bioethics by comparing it to technocratic authority, particularly the technocratic authority claimed by economists in Mexico in the 1980s and 1990s. I find that public bioethics--at least in the dominant forms--is implicitly designed for and tries to use technocratic authority. I examine how this type of bioethics emerged and has continued. I finish by arguing that, as claims to technocratic authority go, bioethics is in an incredibly weak position, which partly explains why it has never gained the degree of public legitimacy that other technocracies have gained. I conclude by arguing for a "technocracy-lite" orientation for public bioethics.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Philosophical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16760101     DOI: 10.1080/03605310600732834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  2 in total

1.  Common morality: comment on Beauchamp and Childress.

Authors:  Oliver Rauprich
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2008-04-08

2.  Framing ethical issues associated with the UK COVID-19 contact tracing app: exceptionalising and narrowing the public ethics debate.

Authors:  G Samuel; F Lucivero
Journal:  Ethics Inf Technol       Date:  2022-01-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.