PURPOSE: To improve upon the conventional projection dephaser (PD) method of background suppression and evaluate the use of multicycle projection dephasers to improve catheter conspicuity in background-suppressed MR images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Passive visualization of endovascular catheters in MR images is compared using two background suppression techniques: 1) the conventional PD method and 2) the multicycle PD method. Contrast-filled 4-French (1.3 mm) catheters were imaged in homogeneous and heterogeneous phantoms, and in the common carotid artery of a canine using a modified spoiled gradient echo imaging sequence. We used catheter-to-background contrast (ranging from -100% to 100%) as the metric to compare background suppression techniques. RESULTS: In the homogeneous and heterogeneous phantoms, the contrast was -6.9% (catheter darker than background) and 15.0%, respectively, using the conventional PD method, and 50.6% and 44.0%, respectively, using the multicycle PD method. In the canine carotid artery, the contrast was -3.1% using the conventional PD method and 53.0% using the multicycle PD method. CONCLUSION: This work shows that multicycle projection dephasers improve catheter conspicuity over the conventional PD method. The multicycle PD method has potential for use in guiding endovascular procedures. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To improve upon the conventional projection dephaser (PD) method of background suppression and evaluate the use of multicycle projection dephasers to improve catheter conspicuity in background-suppressed MR images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Passive visualization of endovascular catheters in MR images is compared using two background suppression techniques: 1) the conventional PD method and 2) the multicycle PD method. Contrast-filled 4-French (1.3 mm) catheters were imaged in homogeneous and heterogeneous phantoms, and in the common carotid artery of a canine using a modified spoiled gradient echo imaging sequence. We used catheter-to-background contrast (ranging from -100% to 100%) as the metric to compare background suppression techniques. RESULTS: In the homogeneous and heterogeneous phantoms, the contrast was -6.9% (catheter darker than background) and 15.0%, respectively, using the conventional PD method, and 50.6% and 44.0%, respectively, using the multicycle PD method. In the canine carotid artery, the contrast was -3.1% using the conventional PD method and 53.0% using the multicycle PD method. CONCLUSION: This work shows that multicycle projection dephasers improve catheter conspicuity over the conventional PD method. The multicycle PD method has potential for use in guiding endovascular procedures. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.