Literature DB >> 16756780

Ripening of cervix for induction of labour by hydrostatic sweeping of membrane versus Foley's catheter ballooning alone.

Fakiha Ifnan1, M B Jameel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness and safety of hydrostatic membrane sweeping versus Foley's catheter ballooning alone in unripe cervix for induction of labour.
DESIGN: Quasi-experimental study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Labour room, department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Unit - II, Nishtar Medical College and Hospital, Multan, from 2003 to 2004. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty medically fit women admitted for normal delivery requiring induction of labour with singleton live pregnancy, Bishop score <6, aged 20-35 years, gestational age > or = 37 weeks and vertex presentation were randomized into two groups for cervical ripening by Foley's catheter ballooning method (group-A) and by hydrostatic membrane sweeping (group-B). Oxytocin infusion was started after catheter expulsion or at 18 hours and amniotomy was carried out once cervix opened to 2 cm or more. Outcome was measured by Bishop score, insertion to delivery interval, mode of delivery and rate of cesarean section.
RESULTS: Mean Bishop score was 7.08 +/- 1.97 in group A and 8.08 + 2.66 in group B (p<0.06). Bishop score > 8 achieved in 60% (15/25) of the patients in group A and 72% (18/25) of the patients in group B. Insertion to delivery interval was 22.30+/-4.03 hours (range 17.25 - 32 hours) in group A and 20.53 + 3.71 hours (range 15 - 29 hours) in group B (p<0.05). Rate of cesarean section was 28% (7/25) in group A and 24% (6/25) in group B.
CONCLUSION: Both Foley's catheter ballooning and hydrostatic membrane sweeping were inexpensive and safe, but hydrostatic membrane sweeping was more effective for better improvement in Bishop score and short insertion to delivery interval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16756780     DOI: 5.2006/JCPSP.347350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak        ISSN: 1022-386X            Impact factor:   0.711


  4 in total

Review 1.  Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.

Authors:  M Boulvain; C Stan; O Irion
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25

2.  Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.

Authors:  Elaine M Finucane; Deirdre J Murphy; Linda M Biesty; Gillian Ml Gyte; Amanda M Cotter; Ethel M Ryan; Michel Boulvain; Declan Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-02-27

3.  Effect of Oxytocin Combined with Different Volume of Water Sac in High-Risk Term Pregnancies.

Authors:  Hanna Mi; Na Sun
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 4.  Mechanical methods for induction of labour.

Authors:  Marieke Dt de Vaan; Mieke Lg Ten Eikelder; Marta Jozwiak; Kirsten R Palmer; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Kitty Wm Bloemenkamp; Ben Willem J Mol; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.