OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship of colonic luminal pressure (CLP) measurements to outcome in horses with large colon volvulus (LCV) after either manual correction or large colon resection and anastomosis (LCRA). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. ANIMALS: Horses (n=57) that had LCV. METHODS: Records for horses with LCV (March 1997-December 2003) were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were strangulating LCV proximal to the cecocolic ligament (>270 degrees), recorded CLP, and successful recovery from anesthesia. CLP measurements and survival/mortality rates were compared between horses that had manual correction (M) or LCRA (R). RESULTS: Of 57 horses, 27 had M and 30 had LCRA. For group M, CLP measurements had a sensitivity of 0.60 and specificity of 0.77 for predicting survival, whereas for group R, sensitivity was 0.50 and specificity was 0.54. CONCLUSION: In our LCV population, elevated CLP measurements had poor accuracy for predicting outcome in horses after surgical correction, especially after LCRA. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CLP measurements based on a single hospital population of horses with LCV should be used with caution for other hospital populations of LCV. CLP may be only one of many variables needed for predicting outcome of horses with strangulating LCV, especially after LCRA.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship of colonic luminal pressure (CLP) measurements to outcome in horses with large colon volvulus (LCV) after either manual correction or large colon resection and anastomosis (LCRA). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. ANIMALS: Horses (n=57) that had LCV. METHODS: Records for horses with LCV (March 1997-December 2003) were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were strangulating LCV proximal to the cecocolic ligament (>270 degrees), recorded CLP, and successful recovery from anesthesia. CLP measurements and survival/mortality rates were compared between horses that had manual correction (M) or LCRA (R). RESULTS: Of 57 horses, 27 had M and 30 had LCRA. For group M, CLP measurements had a sensitivity of 0.60 and specificity of 0.77 for predicting survival, whereas for group R, sensitivity was 0.50 and specificity was 0.54. CONCLUSION: In our LCV population, elevated CLP measurements had poor accuracy for predicting outcome in horses after surgical correction, especially after LCRA. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CLP measurements based on a single hospital population of horses with LCV should be used with caution for other hospital populations of LCV. CLP may be only one of many variables needed for predicting outcome of horses with strangulating LCV, especially after LCRA.
Authors: L M Gonzalez; C A Fogle; W T Baker; F E Hughes; J M Law; A A Motsinger-Reif; A T Blikslager Journal: Equine Vet J Date: 2014-05-29 Impact factor: 2.888
Authors: Kindra E Orr; W True Baker; Tim M Lynch; Faith E Hughes; Carol K Clark; Donnie E Slone; Callie A Fogle; Liara M Gonzalez Journal: Vet Surg Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 1.495