[Pseudoreplication, chatter, and the international nature of science: a response to D.V. Tatarnikov].

The commentary by Tatarnikov (2005) on the design and analysis of manipulative experiments in ecology represents an obvious danger to readers with poor knowledge of modern statistics due to its erroneous interpretation of pseudoreplication and statistical independence. Here we offer clarification of those concepts--and related ones such as experimental unit and evaluation unit--by reference to studies cited by Tatarnikov (2005). We stress the necessity of learning from the accumulated experience of the international scientific community in order not to repeat the errors found in earlier publications that have already been analyzed and widely written about. (An Englisch translation of the full article is available as a pdf-file from either or the authors.)