Literature DB >> 16755088

The effect of senescence of endothelial progenitor cells on in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing coronary stenting.

Yoshiki Matsuo1, Toshio Imanishi, Yasushi Hayashi, Yoshiaki Tomobuchi, Takashi Kubo, Takuzo Hano, Takashi Akasaka.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Restenosis after stent implantation is caused by endothelial cell damage and subsequent neointimal formation. The objective of this study is to elucidate the relevance of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in the development of in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing stent implantation. PATIENTS OR MATERIALS: The subjects were 46 patients who underwent coronary stenting. Blood samples were collected at the time of follow-up coronary angiography after coronary stenting. EPCs were isolated from blood samples and cultured. Their phenotypes were confirmed by uptake of acetylated low-density lipoprotein and binding of fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled Ulex europaeus agglutinin 1 lectin. The number of colony-forming units (CFUs) and the senescent cells, determined by acidic beta-galactosidase staining, was counted. Angiogenic growth factors secreted by EPCs, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (b-FGF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and macrophage chemoattractant protein (MCP-1) from the culture medium were also measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
RESULTS: Patients with in-stent restenosis (defined as >40% stenosis, n=16) had a decreased number of CFUs (p<0.05), and increased senescent cells (p<0.05), compared to patients without restenosis (n=30). There was no significant difference of angiogenic growth factors (VEGF, HGF, b-FGF, and MCP-1) secreted by EPCs between the two groups. On multivariate analysis, an increased number of senescent EPCs was the indepen-dent factor associated with in-stent restenosis (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.20).
CONCLUSION: These data suggested that EPCs might be involved in the development of in-stent restenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16755088     DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.45.1663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Med        ISSN: 0918-2918            Impact factor:   1.271


  7 in total

Review 1.  Role of endothelial progenitor cells during ischemia-induced vasculogenesis and collateral formation.

Authors:  Jörn Tongers; Jerome G Roncalli; Douglas W Losordo
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 3.514

2.  Calcitonin gene-related peptide released from endothelial progenitor cells inhibits the proliferation of rat vascular smooth muscle cells induced by angiotensin II.

Authors:  Li Fang; Mei-Fang Chen; Zhi-Lin Xiao; Yin Liu; Guo-Long Yu; Xiao-Bin Chen; Xiu-Mei Xie
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 3.396

3.  Endothelial progenitor cells: what use for the cardiologist?

Authors:  Aurangzeb Siddique; Eduard Shantsila; Gregory Yh Lip; Chetan Varma
Journal:  J Angiogenes Res       Date:  2010-02-22

Review 4.  Progenitor cells and vascular disease.

Authors:  M Jevon; A Dorling; P I Hornick
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.831

5.  Endothelial progenitor cell number and colony-forming capacity in overweight and obese adults.

Authors:  O J MacEneaney; E J Kushner; G P Van Guilder; J J Greiner; B L Stauffer; C A DeSouza
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 6.  Circulating endothelial cells, microparticles and progenitors: key players towards the definition of vascular competence.

Authors:  F Sabatier; L Camoin-Jau; F Anfosso; J Sampol; F Dignat-George
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.310

7.  The impact of endothelial progenitor cells on restenosis after percutaneous angioplasty of hemodialysis vascular access.

Authors:  Chih-Cheng Wu; Po-Hsun Huang; Chao-Lun Lai; Hsin-Bang Leu; Jaw-Wen Chen; Shing-Jong Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.