Cathleen E Willging1, Melina Salvador, Miria Kano. 1. Behavioral Health Research Center of the Southwest, 612 Encino Place, N.E., Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102, USA. cwillging@bhrcs.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This qualitative study examined the social dynamics of communities and clinic settings that impede the delivery of culturally relevant services to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people living in rural areas. METHODS: Ethnographic interviews were conducted with 20 providers in rural areas to document their perceptions of LGBT mental health care. RESULTS: A majority of rural providers claimed that there is no difference between working with LGBT clients and non-LGBT clients. This neutral therapeutic posture may be insufficient when working with rural LGBT clients. Despite providers' claims of acceptance, lack of education about LGBT mental health issues, and homophobia influenced services for rural LGBT people. LGBT clients had been denied services, discouraged from broaching sexuality and gender issues by providers, and secluded within residential treatment settings. CONCLUSIONS: The challenges of ensuring access to quality care for this population are magnified by provider discourses of "therapeutic neutrality."
OBJECTIVE: This qualitative study examined the social dynamics of communities and clinic settings that impede the delivery of culturally relevant services to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people living in rural areas. METHODS: Ethnographic interviews were conducted with 20 providers in rural areas to document their perceptions of LGBT mental health care. RESULTS: A majority of rural providers claimed that there is no difference between working with LGBT clients and non-LGBT clients. This neutral therapeutic posture may be insufficient when working with rural LGBT clients. Despite providers' claims of acceptance, lack of education about LGBT mental health issues, and homophobia influenced services for rural LGBT people. LGBT clients had been denied services, discouraged from broaching sexuality and gender issues by providers, and secluded within residential treatment settings. CONCLUSIONS: The challenges of ensuring access to quality care for this population are magnified by provider discourses of "therapeutic neutrality."
Authors: Cathleen E Willging; Audrey Harkness; Tania Israel; David Ley; Patricia S Hokanson; Catherine DeMaria; Aaron Joplin; Verida Smiley Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2017-09-16
Authors: Charles S Kamen; Alison Alpert; Liz Margolies; Jennifer J Griggs; Lynae Darbes; Marilyn Smith-Stoner; Megan Lytle; Tonia Poteat; Nfn Scout; Sally A Norton Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kara M Bensley; John Fortney; Gary Chan; Julia C Dombrowski; India Ornelas; Anna D Rubinsky; Gwen T Lapham; Joseph E Glass; Emily C Williams Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Tara M Rutter; Annesa Flentje; James W Dilley; Suzanne Barakat; Nancy H Liu; Margaret S Gross; Ricardo F Muñoz; Yan Leykin Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Laura Hoyt D'Anna; Hannah-Hanh D Nguyen; Grace L Reynolds; Dennis G Fisher; Michael Janson; Cristy Chen; C Kevin Malotte Journal: J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv Date: 2012-05-15