Literature DB >> 16754728

Patient-reported symptoms and quality of life during treatment with tamoxifen or raloxifene for breast cancer prevention: the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial.

Stephanie R Land1, D Lawrence Wickerham, Joseph P Costantino, Marcie W Ritter, Victor G Vogel, Myoungkeun Lee, Eduardo R Pajon, James L Wade, Shaker Dakhil, James B Lockhart, Norman Wolmark, Patricia A Ganz.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Tamoxifen has been approved for breast cancer risk reduction in high-risk women, but how raloxifene compares with tamoxifen is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the differences in patient-reported outcomes, quality of life [QOL], and symptoms in Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) participants by treatment assignment. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND
INTERVENTIONS: STAR was a double-blind, randomized phase 3 prevention trial designed to evaluate the relative efficacy of raloxifene vs tamoxifen in reducing the incidence of invasive breast cancer in high-risk postmenopausal women. Between July 1, 1999, and November 4, 2004, 19,747 participants were enrolled at centers throughout North America, with a median potential follow-up time of 4.6 years (range, 1.2-6.5 years). Patient-reported symptoms were collected from all participants using a 36-item symptom checklist. Quality of life was measured with the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D), and the Medical Outcomes Study Sexual Activity Questionnaire in a substudy of 1983 participants, median potential follow-up 5.4 years (range, 4.6-6.0 years). Questionnaires were administered before treatment, every 6 months for 60 months and at 72 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary QOL end points were the SF-36 physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summaries.
RESULTS: Among women in the QOL analysis, mean PCS, MCS, and CES-D scores worsened modestly over the study's 60 months, with no significant difference between the tamoxifen (n = 973) and raloxifene (n = 1010) groups (P>.2). Sexual function was slightly better for participants assigned to tamoxifen (age-adjusted repeated measure odds ratio, 1.22%; 95% CI, 1.01-1.46). Of the women in the symptom assessment analyses, the 9769 in the raloxifene group reported greater mean symptom severity over 60 months of assessments than the 9743 in the tamoxifen group for musculoskeletal problems (1.15 vs 1.10, P = .002), dyspareunia (0.78 vs 0.68, P<.001), and weight gain (0.82 vs 0.76, P<.001). Women in the tamoxifen group reported greater mean symptom severity for gynecological problems (0.29 vs 0.19, P<.001), vasomotor symptoms (0.96 vs 0.85, P<.001), leg cramps (1.10 vs 0.91, P<.001), and bladder control symptoms (0.88 vs 0.73, P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences existed between the tamoxifen and raloxifene groups in patient-reported outcomes for physical health, mental health, and depression, although the tamoxifen group reported better sexual function. Although mean symptom severity was low among these postmenopausal women, those in the tamoxifen group reported more gynecological problems, vasomotor symptoms, leg cramps, and bladder control problems, whereas women in the raloxifene group reported more musculoskeletal problems, dyspareunia, and weight gain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00003906.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16754728     DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.23.joc60075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  65 in total

1.  Withaferin A inhibits activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 in human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Joomin Lee; Eun-Ryeong Hahm; Shivendra V Singh
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Patient-reported outcomes with anastrozole versus tamoxifen for postmenopausal patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with lumpectomy plus radiotherapy (NSABP B-35): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial.

Authors:  Patricia A Ganz; Reena S Cecchini; Thomas B Julian; Richard G Margolese; Joseph P Costantino; Laura A Vallow; Kathy S Albain; Patrick W Whitworth; Mary E Cianfrocca; Adam M Brufsky; Howard M Gross; Gamini S Soori; Judith O Hopkins; Louis Fehrenbacher; Keren Sturtz; Timothy F Wozniak; Thomas E Seay; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  A single-arm clinical trial investigating the effectiveness of a non-hormonal, hyaluronic acid-based vaginal moisturizer in endometrial cancer survivors.

Authors:  Jeanne Carter; Shari Goldfarb; Raymond E Baser; Deborah J Goldfrank; Barbara Seidel; Lisania Milli; Sally Saban; Cara Stabile; Jocelyn Canty; Ginger J Gardner; Elizabeth L Jewell; Yukio Sonoda; Marisa A Kollmeier; Kaled M Alektiar
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Affective forecasting and medication decision making in breast-cancer prevention.

Authors:  Michael Hoerger; Laura D Scherer; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 5.  Cardiovascular health and aromatase inhibitors.

Authors:  Kathleen I Pritchard; Beth L Abramson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Health-related quality of life before and after a breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Amy Trentham-Dietz; Brian L Sprague; Ronald Klein; Barbara E K Klein; Karen J Cruickshanks; Dennis G Fryback; John M Hampton
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Nonhormonal management of hot flashes for women on risk reduction therapy.

Authors:  Kostandinos Sideras; Charles L Loprinzi
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 11.908

8.  A prospective longitudinal clinical trial evaluating quality of life after breast-conserving surgery and high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Adam A Garsa; Daniel J Ferraro; Todd A DeWees; Teresa L Deshields; Julie A Margenthaler; Amy E Cyr; Michael Naughton; Rebecca Aft; William E Gillanders; Timothy Eberlein; Melissa A Matesa; Laura L Ochoa; Imran Zoberi
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Combinational treatment of gap junctional activator and tamoxifen in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Gunjan Gakhar; Duy H Hua; Thu Annelise Nguyen
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.248

Review 10.  The use of tamoxifen and raloxifene for the prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  D Lawrence Wickerham; Joseph P Costantino; Victor G Vogel; Walter M Cronin; Reena S Cecchini; Leslie G Ford; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.