Literature DB >> 16753959

Effect of methamidophos and urea application on microbial communities in soils as determined by microbial biomass and community level physiological profiles.

Meng-Cheng Wang1, Ming Gong, Hong-Bing Zang, Xiao-Mei Hua, Jian Yao, Yan-Jun Pang, Yong-Hua Yang.   

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the effect of the application by two agrochemicals, methamidophos (O,S-dimethyl phosphoroamidothioate) and urea, on microbial diversity in soil, using the combined approaches of soil microbial biomass analysis and community level physiological profiles (CLPPs). The results showed that both a low and a high level of methamidophos application (CS2 and CS3) and urea application (CS4) significantly decreased microbial biomass C (Cmic) by 41-83% compared with the control (CS1). The soil organic C (Corg) values of CS3 and CS4 were significantly higher and lower by 24% and 14%, respectively, than that of CS1. Similarly to Cmic, the values of Cmic/Corg of the three applied soils which decreased were lower by 31-84% than that of CS1. In contrast, the respiration activity of the three applied soils were significantly higher than the control. Agrochemical application also significantly increased the soil total of N and P (Ntol and Ptol) and decreased the Corg/Ntol and Corg/Ptol values. The CLPPs results showed that the AWCD (average well color development) of the three applied soils were significantly higher than that of CS1 during the incubation period. Substrate richness, Shannon and Simpson indices of microbial communities under chemical stresses, increased significantly. In addition, the CFU (colony-forming unit) numbers of methamidophos metabolized bacteria in CS2 and CS3 also increased significantly by 86.1% and 188.9% compared with that of CS1. The combined results suggest that agrochemicals reduce microbial biomass and enhance functional diversities of soil microbial communities; meanwhile, some species of bacteria may be enriched in soils under methamidophos stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16753959     DOI: 10.1080/03601230600616155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Sci Health B        ISSN: 0360-1234            Impact factor:   1.990


  5 in total

1.  Non-target effects of pretilachlor on microbial properties in tropical rice soil.

Authors:  Subhashree Sahoo; Totan Adak; Torit B Bagchi; Upendra Kumar; Sushmita Munda; Sanjoy Saha; J Berliner; Mayabini Jena; B B Mishra
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  The effect of the Falcon 460 EC fungicide on soil microbial communities, enzyme activities and plant growth.

Authors:  Małgorzata Baćmaga; Jadwiga Wyszkowska; Jan Kucharski
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 3.  Soil under stress: The importance of soil life and how it is influenced by (micro)plastic pollution.

Authors:  L Joos; C De Tender
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 7.271

Review 4.  Bioinoculants-Natural Biological Resources for Sustainable Plant Production.

Authors:  Sagar Maitra; Marian Brestic; Preetha Bhadra; Tanmoy Shankar; Subhashisa Praharaj; Jnana Bharati Palai; M Mostafizur Rahman Shah; Viliam Barek; Peter Ondrisik; Milan Skalický; Akbar Hossain
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-12-27

Review 5.  Linking Soil Microbial Diversity to Modern Agriculture Practices: A Review.

Authors:  Amrita Gupta; Udai B Singh; Pramod K Sahu; Surinder Paul; Adarsh Kumar; Deepti Malviya; Shailendra Singh; Pandiyan Kuppusamy; Prakash Singh; Diby Paul; Jai P Rai; Harsh V Singh; Madhab C Manna; Theodore C Crusberg; Arun Kumar; Anil K Saxena
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.