Literature DB >> 16753864

Clinical implications of chromosomal abnormalities in multiple myeloma.

Evangelos Terpos1, Vangelis Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, Meletios-Athanassios Dimopoulos.   

Abstract

The adverse prognostic role of cytogenetic abnormalities has recently been established in plasma cell dyscrasias. Modern techniques such as fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization have revealed a higher incidence of cytogenetic abnormalities in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) compared to conventional cytogenetics. Hypodiploidy and chromosome 13 abnormalities are found in more than 50% of myeloma patients, representing well known factors with adverse prognosis. Rearrangements involving the switch regions of immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) gene at 14q32 with various partner genes represent the most common structural abnormalities, having an incidence of 70% in MM. Structural abnormalities of chromosomes 17 and 8 involving the p53 and c-myc genes are considered to be less frequent events, but carry a poor prognosis. New therapeutic approaches such as non-myeloablative allotransplantation and modern therapeutic agents (thalidomide, lenalidomide, and bortezomib) and their combinations give promise for an improved therapeutic management of patients with MM. The detection of t(4;14), t(14;16), deletion of chromosome 13 on metaphase analysis, or deletion of p53 by FISH will define high-risk prognostic groups that are not generally controlled with high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and should therefore be treated with more investigational therapies. Alternatively, eligible patients who do not have these poor risk factors are more likely to benefit from a high-dose, melphalan-based, regimen followed by ASCT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16753864     DOI: 10.1080/10428190500464104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma        ISSN: 1026-8022


  6 in total

1.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of chromosome aberrations in 60 Chinese patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Xiao Gao; Chunming Li; Run Zhang; Ruifang Yang; Xiaoyan Qu; Hairong Qiu; Jiaren Xu; Hua Lu; Jianyong Li; Lijuan Chen
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Conventional Cytogenetics and Interphase Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Results in Multiple Myeloma: A Turkey Laboratory Analysis of 381 Cases.

Authors:  Cigdem Aydin; Turgay Ulas; Ceren Hangul; Orhan Kemal Yucel; Utku Iltar; Ozan Salim; Deniz Ekinci; Sibel Berker Karauzum
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  Current approaches to the initial treatment of symptomatic multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jagoda K Jasielec; Andrzej J Jakubowiak
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2013-02

4.  Transient Plasmacytosis With Trisomy of Chromosome 8 in a Patient With Multiple Myeloma: A Case Report.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Akuzawa; Takashi Hatori; Kunihiko Imai; Yonosuke Kitahara; Shinji Sakurai; Masahiko Kurabayashi
Journal:  World J Oncol       Date:  2013-09-27

5.  1q21 Gain Combined with High-Risk Factors Is a Heterogeneous Prognostic Factor in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Multicenter Study in China.

Authors:  Xiaozhe Li; Wenming Chen; Yin Wu; Jianyong Li; Lijuan Chen; Baijun Fang; Ying Feng; Junru Liu; Meilan Chen; Jingli Gu; Beihui Huang; Juan Li
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-08-27

6.  The amplification of 1q21 is an adverse prognostic factor in patients with multiple myeloma in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Wenjun Yu; Rui Guo; Xiaoyan Qu; Hairong Qiu; Jianyong Li; Run Zhang; Lijuan Chen
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 4.147

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.