Literature DB >> 16753409

Regionalization of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: evidence for the increasing burden of care on tertiary centers.

David S Morris1, David A Taub, John T Wei, Rodney L Dunn, J Stuart Wolf, Brent K Hollenbeck.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The regionalization of procedures to specialized medical centers has been suggested as a means to improve the quality of care for select high risk procedures. Prior work has demonstrated the spontaneous regionalization of high risk procedures to tertiary centers. Similar concentration of complex, low risk procedures (e.g. percutaneous nephrolithotomy) to these centers would underscore the increasing burden of care placed on these hospitals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to identify 12,948 patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy for stones between 1988 and 2002. Regionalization was measured based on the 6 structural hospital qualities of teaching status, urban location, bed capacity, hospital throughput (all diagnoses), annual percutaneous nephrolithotomy volume and for-profit status. Logistic regression was used to determine the propensity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy to concentrate to these medical centers.
RESULTS: Compared to procedures performed between 1988 and 1990, patients were more likely to undergo percutaneous nephrolithotomy at teaching (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-1.9), high percutaneous nephrolithotomy volume (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.6-1.9), large bed capacity (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3) and high throughput hospitals (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.3-1.4) in the years 2000 to 2002.
CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, a technically complex but low risk procedure, has spontaneously regionalized to tertiary centers, suggesting the migration of complex surgical care to these centers. The impact of this increasing burden of care on tertiary centers is unclear but may be problematic in the current reimbursement environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16753409     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00512-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  5 in total

1.  Stone culture retrieved during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is it clinically relevant?

Authors:  Yasser Osman; Ahmed M Elshal; Mohamed M Elawdy; Helmy Omar; Asaad Gaber; Essam Elsawy; Ahmed R El-Nahas
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  National rates and risk factors for stent failure after successful insertion in patients with obstructed, infected upper tract stones.

Authors:  Briony Varda; Akshay Sood; Nandita Krishna; Giorgio Gandaglia; Jesse D Sammon; John Zade; Marianne Schmid; Kevin C Zorn; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Naeem Bhojani
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Salvage Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Analysis of Outcomes following Initial Treatment Failure.

Authors:  Michael S Borofsky; Daniel A Wollin; Thanmaya Reddy; Ojas Shah; Dean G Assimos; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Focal neuropathies following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)--preliminary study.

Authors:  Hamidreza Nasseh; Farshid Pourreza; Alia Saberi; Ehsan Kazemnejad; Behnam Behmardi Kalantari; Siavash Falahatkar
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2013-06-13

5.  The use of a biological model for comparing two techniques of fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous puncture: A randomised cross-over study.

Authors:  Mohamed M Abdallah; Shady M Salem; Mohamed R Badreldin; Ahmed A Gamaleldin
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2013-01-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.