Literature DB >> 16753049

A randomised controlled trial comparing outpatient versus daycase endometrial polypectomy.

F A Marsh1, L J Rogerson, S R G Duffy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outpatient versus daycase endometrial polypectomy by comparing success rate, complications, patient tolerance, pain score, analgesia requirement and recovery.
DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: A large UK Teaching hospital. POPULATION: Forty consecutive women diagnosed with an endometrial polyp at outpatient hysteroscopy were randomly assigned in equal proportions to outpatient or daycase polyp removal.
METHODS: The outpatient cohort underwent endometrial polypectomy either using grasping forceps or a bipolar electrode (Versapoint; Gynecare Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA) introduced down the operating channel of a rigid hysteroscope (Versascope; Gynecare Inc.). The daycase cohort underwent traditional endometrial polyp resection using a hysteroscopic, monopolar, electrosurgical resecting loop, performed under general anaesthetic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were as follows: success rates and intra or postoperative complications, time away from home, analgesia requirements, pain scores on the day of and one day after endometrial polypectomy, return to work and preoperative fitness and preference for the location of a future endometrial polypectomy.
RESULTS: The majority of women from both cohorts were premenopausal (62.5%), parous (85%) and in paid employment (62.5%). One woman allocated to outpatient polypectomy had cervical stenosis and dilatation was unsuccessful in the outpatient setting. There were no other intra or postoperative complications in either arm of the study. The mean intraoperative visual analogue style (0-100 mm) pain score during outpatient polypectomy was 23.7 mm (1-62). A proportion of women (20%) described no intraoperative discomfort; however, the majority (75%) described mild or moderate intraoperative discomfort. More women in the outpatient cohort (58%) described themselves as pain free for the remainder of the day than in the daycase cohort (28%) (P= 0.09). The day after the procedure, all women from the outpatient group described slight or no discomfort compared with only 41% of women from the daycase group (P= 0.02). All women undergoing outpatient polypectomy had a significantly shorter mean time away from home (3.24 [1.5-5] hours) than women undergoing daycase polypectomy (7.42 [6-10.5] hours), P < 0.0005. Similarly, women from the outpatient cohort had a significantly faster mean return to preoperative fitness (1 [0-4] day versus 3.2 [1-13] days; P= 0.001) and required less postoperative analgesia than the daycase cohort. Ninety-five percent of women from the outpatient cohort and 82% of women from the daycase cohort stated they would prefer to undergo an endometrial polypectomy in the outpatient setting should they require a further polyp removal.
CONCLUSION: Endometrial polypectomy can be successfully performed in the outpatient setting with minimal intraoperative discomfort, a significantly shorter time away from home and faster recovery and is preferred by women when compared with daycase polypectomy. Resources need to be made rapidly available to undertake larger scale research and develop this service across the UK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16753049     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00967.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  7 in total

Review 1.  Hysteroscopic polypectomy prior to infertility treatment: A cost analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Youssef Mouhayar; Ophelia Yin; Sunni L Mumford; James H Segars
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.435

2.  Outpatient uterine assessment and treatment unit in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding: an economic modelling study.

Authors:  Alexandria Bennett; Kednapa Thavorn; Kristina Arendas; Doug Coyle; Sukhbir S Singh
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-12-08

3.  The efficacy, cost and patient satisfaction of classic versus office hysteroscopy in cases with suspected intrauterine space occupying lesions with 3-dimension ultrasound and abnormal uterine bleeding.

Authors:  Tarık Filiz; Emek Doğer; Aydın Corakçı; Semih Ozeren; Eray Calışkan
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2009-12-01

4.  Current practice in the removal of benign endometrial polyps: a Dutch survey.

Authors:  Lotte J E W van Dijk; Maria C Breijer; Sebastiaan Veersema; Ben W J Mol; Anne Timmermans
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2011-10-19

5.  Outpatient versus inpatient uterine polyp treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding: randomised controlled non-inferiority study.

Authors:  Natalie A M Cooper; T Justin Clark; Lee Middleton; Lavanya Diwakar; Paul Smith; Elaine Denny; Tracy Roberts; Lynda Stobert; Susan Jowett; Jane Daniels
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-03-23

6.  Retrospective Cohort Study on the Symptomatic Recurrence Pattern after Hysteroscopic Polypectomy.

Authors:  Jorge Cea García; Antonio Jiménez Caraballo; María Del Mar Ríos Vallejo; Ignacio Zapardiel
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2020-10-15

7.  A Pilot Study Comparing Hysteroscopic Adhesiolysis by Conventional Resectoscope Versus Mini-resectoscope.

Authors:  Kallol Kumar Roy; Archana Lingampally; Yamini Kansal; Juhi Bharti; Sunesh Kumar; Perumal Vanamail; Seema Singhal; Jyoti Meena
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2017-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.