Literature DB >> 16752608

Overview of anaerobic treatment: thermophilic and propionate implications.

R E Speece1, Saroch Boonyakitsombut, Moonil Kim, Nuri Azbar, Pepi Ursillo.   

Abstract

Difficulties in achieving low propionate concentrations in anaerobically treated effluents are frequently reported in the literature (Ahring, 1994; Kugelman and Guida, 1989; Rimkus et al., 1982), especially at thermophilic temperatures, with concentrations as high as 1000 to 9600 mg/L sometimes produced. This paper will detail the effect of several variables on the performance of both mesophilic and thermophilic regimes. Studies concerning the effect of the following four important factors on performance are included: reactor configuration, inorganic nutrient supplementation, substrate characteristics, and the unique role of microbial consortia proximity in enhancing performance. Reactor configuration modifications, essential nutrient additions, and the importance of close microbial proximity were all found to contribute to improvement in thermophilic anaerobic digestion in all the studies. It was found that, in substrates that shunt significant amounts of the electron donor through propionate, performance was critically related to reactor optimization, with propionate removal efficiency considerably improved using intact upflow anaerobic sludge blanket granules, less so in a homogenized granule slurry blanket, and noticeably reduced even more when the completely stirred reactor configuration of homogenized granules was used. The critical importance of extremely close microbial consortia proximity in maintaining hydrogen intermediates at very low levels to efficiently convert propionate to hydrogen and acetate was demonstrated. Compared to mesophilic digestion, thermophilic digestion manifested elevated levels of propionate, except in the nonmixed reactors, which had close microbial consortia proximity. The reactor configuration with the best results was the anaerobic digestion elutriated phased treatment (ADEPT) scheme, in which the raw sludge was elutriated of its fermenting volatile fatty acids, as they are generated in a short 5- to 8-day solids retention time (SRT) in one reactor and the elutriate then metabolized by passing up through a methanogenic granule or slurry blanket (with its close microbial consortia proximity) in a separate reactor with a 20- to 50-day SRT. Loading rates and performance of the ADEPT reactor configuration were superior to the standard continuously stirred tank reactor, and ADEPT thermophilic temperatures allowed higher organic loading rates without high propionate concentrations in the effluent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16752608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Environ Res        ISSN: 1061-4303            Impact factor:   1.946


  8 in total

1.  Biogas Production Potential of Thermophilic Anaerobic Biodegradation of Organic Waste by a Microbial Consortium Identified with Metagenomics.

Authors:  Lyudmila Kabaivanova; Penka Petrova; Venelin Hubenov; Ivan Simeonov
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-08

2.  Feedstocks affect the diversity and distribution of propionate CoA-transferase genes (pct) in anaerobic digesters.

Authors:  Yueh-Fen Li; Shan Wei; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 3.  Syntrophic propionate-oxidizing bacteria in methanogenic systems.

Authors:  Maria Westerholm; Magdalena Calusinska; Jan Dolfing
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 16.408

4.  Hybrid alkali-hydrodynamic disintegration of waste-activated sludge before two-stage anaerobic digestion process.

Authors:  Klaudiusz Grübel; Jan Suschka
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion using kitchen waste and poultry manure as substrate-part 1: substrate ratio and effect of temperature.

Authors:  Md Anisur Rahman; Razu Shahazi; Syada Noureen Basher Nova; M Rakib Uddin; Md Shahadat Hossain; Abu Yousuf
Journal:  Biomass Convers Biorefin       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.050

6.  Ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis as a tool for monitoring methanogenic Archaea changes in an anaerobic digester.

Authors:  Slawomir Ciesielski; Katarzyna Bułkowska; Dorota Dabrowska; Dariusz Kaczmarczyk; Przemyslaw Kowal; Justyna Możejko
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 7.  Relating Anaerobic Digestion Microbial Community and Process Function.

Authors:  Kaushik Venkiteshwaran; Benjamin Bocher; James Maki; Daniel Zitomer
Journal:  Microbiol Insights       Date:  2016-04-20

8.  Identification of metabolite and protein explanatory variables governing microbiome establishment and re-establishment within a cellulose-degrading anaerobic bioreactor.

Authors:  Stephen J Callister; Lee Ann McCue; Amy A Boaro; Brian LaMarche; Richard A White; Joseph M Brown; Birgitte K Ahring
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.