Literature DB >> 16752278

Aseptic loosening, not only a question of wear: a review of different theories.

Mikael Sundfeldt1, Lars V Carlsson, Carina B Johansson, Peter Thomsen, Christina Gretzer.   

Abstract

Today, aseptic loosening is the most common cause of revision of major arthroplasties. Aseptic loosening accounts for more than two-thirds of hip revisions and almost one-half of knee revisions in Sweden. Several theories on the cause of aseptic loosening have been proposed. Most of these theories, however, are based on empiric observations, experimental animal models or anecdotal cases. In this review, we discuss the most common theories concerning aseptic loosening. It emerges from this review that aseptic loosening has a multifactorial etiology and cannot be explained by a single theory.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16752278     DOI: 10.1080/17453670610045902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.717


  123 in total

1.  Highly crosslinked polyethylene does not reduce aseptic loosening in cemented THA 10-year findings of a randomized study.

Authors:  Per-Erik Johanson; Georgios Digas; Peter Herberts; Jonas Thanner; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Bisphosphonates for periprosthetic bone loss after joint arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of 14 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  T Lin; S-G Yan; X-Z Cai; Z-M Ying
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Subsidence of a cementless femoral component influenced by body weight and body mass index.

Authors:  Christoph Stihsen; Roman Radl; Armin Keshmiri; Peter Rehak; Reinhard Windhager
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Bacterial pathogen-associated molecular patterns stimulate biological activity of orthopaedic wear particles by activating cognate Toll-like receptors.

Authors:  Edward M Greenfield; Michelle A Beidelschies; Joscelyn M Tatro; Victor M Goldberg; Amy G Hise
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Analysis of migration of the Nanos® short-stem hip implant within two years after surgery.

Authors:  Stefan Budde; Frank Seehaus; Michael Schwarze; Christof Hurschler; Thilo Floerkemeier; Henning Windhagen; Yvonne Noll; Max Ettinger; Fritz Thorey
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  [Bridging posttraumatic bony defects. Established and new methods].

Authors:  M Schieker; W Mutschler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  The effects of nanoscale pits on primary human osteoblast adhesion formation and cellular spreading.

Authors:  M J P Biggs; R G Richards; N Gadegaard; C D W Wilkinson; M J Dalby
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Experimental micromechanics of the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  Kenneth A Mann; Mark A Miller; Richard J Cleary; Dennis Janssen; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 9.  Chronic inflammation in biomaterial-induced periprosthetic osteolysis: NF-κB as a therapeutic target.

Authors:  Tzu-hua Lin; Yasunobu Tamaki; Jukka Pajarinen; Heather A Waters; Deanna K Woo; Zhenyu Yao; Stuart B Goodman
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  Inhibition of osteolysis after local administration of osthole in a TCP particles-induced osteolysis model.

Authors:  Shumin Lv; Yun Zhang; Ming Yan; Hongjiao Mao; Cailing Pan; Mingxiao Gan; Jiawen Fan; Guoxia Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.