Literature DB >> 16752089

Return to work after two years of total disability: a case report.

Donald R Murphy1, Alisson Rosenblum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is specifically written regarding the details of clinical interventions with workers with chronic spinal pain. Specifically, the individual thought process behind the management of an injured worker is not often discussed except in clinical conferences or discussions with other clinicians. It is well known that once an injured worker is disabled from work for 2 years, successful return is unlikely. We thought it would be informative to illustrate the clinical approach we took with this case because of the history of long term pain and disability.
METHODS: This paper describes the conservative management of a patient who was disabled from work for 2 years, using an integrated approach including chiropractic manipulation, pain education, restricted duty and clear communications among all parties involved.
RESULTS: After 15 weeks, the patient returned to her previous occupation as a nurse, first part time, and subsequently full time.
CONCLUSION: This report is provided to illustrate a systematic approach diagnosis and treatment to assist this injured workers return to work. This case illustrates that even after 2 years successful return to work can be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16752089     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-006-9017-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  33 in total

1.  Work restrictions and outcome of nonspecific low back pain.

Authors:  Rudi Hiebert; Mary Louise Skovron; Margareta Nordin; Michael Crane
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The role of neuroticism, pain catastrophizing and pain-related fear in vigilance to pain: a structural equations approach.

Authors:  Liesbet Goubert; Geert Crombez; Stefaan Van Damme
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 3.  Neurophysiological effects of spinal manipulation.

Authors:  Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Biomechanics of spinal manipulative therapy.

Authors:  J J Triano
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Lowering fear-avoidance and enhancing function through exposure in vivo. A multiple baseline study across six patients with back pain.

Authors:  Katja Boersma; Steven Linton; Thomas Overmeer; Markus Jansson; Johan Vlaeyen; Jeroen de Jong
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Pain catastrophizing predicts pain intensity, disability, and psychological distress independent of the level of physical impairment.

Authors:  R Severeijns; J W Vlaeyen; M A van den Hout; W E Weber
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.442

7.  Fear-avoidance beliefs and catastrophizing: occurrence and risk factor in back pain and ADL in the general population.

Authors:  Nina Buer; Steven J Linton
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  The Bournemouth Questionnaire: a short-form comprehensive outcome measure. II. Psychometric properties in neck pain patients.

Authors:  Jennifer E Bolton; B Kim Humphreys
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.437

9.  Occupational disorders and return to work: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Jens Peter Bonde; Mette Skou Rasmussen; Henrik Hjøllund; Susanne Wulf Svendsen; Henrik A Kolstad; Lone Donbaek Jensen; Joanna Wieclaw
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Risk factors for incident neck and shoulder pain in hospital nurses.

Authors:  J Smedley; H Inskip; F Trevelyan; P Buckle; C Cooper; D Coggon
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.