Literature DB >> 16752022

Safety of endoscopical procedures during pregnancy.

W L Quan1, C K Chia, H B Yim.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Data on safety issues and therapeutic outcomes of endoscopy in pregnancy remains limited especially in the local context. The concerns are that of safety in sedation and radiation to the foetus, effects on the pregnancy, the need for special precautions on mother and foetus during the procedure and long-term foetal outcome. We report a case series on four pregnant women to address these concerns and outline their therapeutic approaches.
METHODS: We reviewed four patients who underwent oral gastroduodenoscopy (OGD) or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during their pregnancies. Lead aprons were used to shield the foetuses in all patients that underwent ERCP. Sedation was given when necessary, and an anaesthetist was employed in one case for close patient monitoring. Fluoroscopy was minimised and radiographs were taken only when essential.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 27.8 years (range 23-35 years). The mean gestation was 21.5 weeks (range 14-32 weeks), with two patients each being in their second and third trimesters. The indications for ERCP were cholangitis and pancreatitis (one), choledocholithiasis on ultrasonography (two), and that for OGD was persistent vomiting (one). Two patients underwent sphincterotomy and one had a biliary stent inserted. One patient was lost to follow-up. The other three had a full-term normal delivery and all babies were healthy at birth with good birth weight and normal Apgar scores.
CONCLUSION: Our series showed that endoscopic procedures in pregnancy are safe for both mother and foetus. However, these procedures should be restricted to cases with definite. indications and radiation exposure should be minimised with additional safety precautions such as minimal radiation exposure and the use of lead shield when applicable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16752022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  9 in total

Review 1.  Risks versus benefits of gastrointestinal endoscopy during pregnancy.

Authors:  Mitchell S Cappell
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  ERCP in pregnancy: is it safe?

Authors:  Adel Y Daas; Amir Agha; Haim Pinkas; Jay Mamel; Patrick G Brady
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2009-12

3.  Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and use of laparoscopy for surgical problems during pregnancy: this statement was reviewed and approved by the Board of Governors of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), September 2007. It was prepared by the SAGES Guidelines Committee.

Authors:  Hori Yumi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Diagnosis and laparoscopic treatment of surgical diseases during pregnancy: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Heidi Jackson; Steven Granger; Raymond Price; Michael Rollins; David Earle; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and use of laparoscopy for surgical problems during pregnancy.

Authors:  Jonathan Pearl; Raymond Price; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  SAGES guidelines for the use of laparoscopy during pregnancy.

Authors:  Jonathan P Pearl; Raymond R Price; Allison E Tonkin; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Fulminant ulcerative colitis in a healthy pregnant woman.

Authors:  Rossana Orabona; Adriana Valcamonico; Marianna Salemme; Stefania Manenti; Guido A M Tiberio; Tiziana Frusca
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohamed Azab; Shishira Bharadwaj; Mahendran Jayaraj; Annie S Hong; Pejman Solaimani; Mohamad Mubder; Hyeyoung Yeom; Ji Won Yoo; Michael L Volk
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.485

9.  Case report: gastric carcinoma diagnosed at the second trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  Tayfur Cift; Begüm Aydogan; Murat Akbaş; Burcu Aydın; Fuat Demirkiran; Dogu V Bakkaloglu; Sennur Ilvan
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-07-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.