Literature DB >> 16752012

Economic evaluation.

M F Drummond1, R Aguiar-Ibanez, J Nixon.   

Abstract

Given the need to assess the value for money of healthcare treatments, economic evaluation has been gaining popularity over the past ten years. Studies comparing the costs and consequences of alternative healthcare interventions have been published in all fields of healthcare. This article describes the basic forms of economic evaluation and outlines the key methodological features to be considered in the critical appraisal of studies. Issues such as the appropriateness of the study question, the selection of alternatives to be compared, the measurement of costs and consequences, and the assessment of uncertainty are discussed. Additionally, an analytical critique of economic evaluations undertaken in Singapore is provided, and the prospects for economic evaluation in the future are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16752012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  7 in total

Review 1.  Economic evaluations of cholesterol-lowering drugs: a critical and systematic review.

Authors:  Pearl D Gumbs; Monique W M Verschuren; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Ardine G de Wit; Anthonius de Boer; Olaf H Klungel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  A Review on Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility of Psychosocial Care in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Femke Jansen; Valesca van Zwieten; Veerle M H Coupé; C René Leemans; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

3.  Economic evaluation studies in the field of HIV/AIDS: bibliometric analysis on research development and scopes (GAPRESEARCH).

Authors:  Bach Xuan Tran; Long Hoang Nguyen; Hugo C Turner; Son Nghiem; Giang Thu Vu; Cuong Tat Nguyen; Carl A Latkin; Cyrus S H Ho; Roger C M Ho
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Efficacy, Feasibility, Adherence, and Cost Effectiveness of a mHealth Telerehabilitation Program in Low Risk Cardiac Patients: A Study Protocol.

Authors:  José-Manuel Pastora-Bernal; Joaquín-Jesús Hernández-Fernández; María-José Estebanez-Pérez; Guadalupe Molina-Torres; Francisco-José García-López; Rocío Martín-Valero
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Dutch utility weights for the EORTC cancer-specific utility instrument: the Dutch EORTC QLU-C10D.

Authors:  Femke Jansen; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Eva Gamper; Richard Norman; Bernhard Holzner; Madeleine King; Georg Kemmler
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Psychological problems among cancer patients in relation to healthcare and societal costs: A systematic review.

Authors:  Florie E Van Beek; Lonneke M A Wijnhoven; Karen Holtmaat; José A E Custers; Judith B Prins; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Femke Jansen
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.955

7.  Newborn screening by tandem mass spectrometry for glutaric aciduria type 1: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Johannes Pfeil; Stefan Listl; Georg F Hoffmann; Stefan Kölker; Martin Lindner; Peter Burgard
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.123

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.