Literature DB >> 16751644

Specialist contraceptive counselling and provision after termination of pregnancy improves uptake of long-acting methods but does not prevent repeat abortion: a randomized trial.

C Schunmann1, Anna Glasier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One in four abortions in the UK is undertaken for women who have had one before. Women undergoing abortion in Edinburgh were targeted for improved contraceptive advice and provision in this randomized trial.
METHODS: Between November 2001 and May 2002, women recruited at assessment for abortion were randomized at admission to receive specialist contraceptive advice and enhanced provision (316 women) or standard care (297 women). Randomization was based on the week of admission. Contraceptive use 16 weeks after abortion was assessed by questionnaire and subsequent abortions by review of the hospital records 2 years later.
RESULTS: Women receiving specialist advice and enhanced provision were more likely to leave the hospital with contraception (271 versus 115, P < 0.001), which was more likely to be a long-acting method (141 versus 78, P < 0.001) than women receiving standard care. Four months later, there was no significant difference in contraceptive prevalence or continuation, but women in the intervention group were more likely to be using contraceptive implants (32 versus 6, P < 0.001). Two years later, 14.6% of women in the intervention group (44/302) and 10% of controls (27/268) had undergone another abortion in the same hospital (P = 0.267).
CONCLUSIONS: Specialist contraceptive advice and enhanced provision had a short-lived effect on contraceptive uptake and increased the use of long-acting methods but did not appear to reduce repeat abortions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16751644     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  21 in total

1.  Adverse childhood experiences and repeat induced abortion.

Authors:  Maria E Bleil; Nancy E Adler; Lauri A Pasch; Barbara Sternfeld; Renee A Reijo-Pera; Marcelle I Cedars
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Interventions for encouraging sexual behaviours intended to prevent cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan P Shepherd; Geoff K Frampton; Petra Harris
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-04-13

3.  Funding policies and postabortion long-acting reversible contraception: results from a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Corinne H Rocca; Kirsten M J Thompson; Suzan Goodman; Carolyn L Westhoff; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Peri-abortion contraceptive use in the French islands of Guadeloupe and La Réunion: variation in the management of post-abortion care.

Authors:  Caroline Moreau; James Trussell; Julie Desfreres; Nathalie Bajos
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Contraceptive method preferences and provision after termination of pregnancy: a population-based analysis of women obtaining care with the British Pregnancy Advisory Service.

Authors:  Ara Aiken; P A Lohr; C E Aiken; T Forsyth; J Trussell
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Patterns of contraceptive use before and after an abortion: results from a nationally representative survey of women undergoing an abortion in France.

Authors:  Caroline Moreau; James Trussell; Julie Desfreres; Nathalie Bajos
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Choices on contraceptive methods in post-abortion family planning clinic in the northeast Brazil.

Authors:  Ana Laura Cg Ferreira; Ariani I Souza; Raitza A Lima; Cynthia Braga
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.223

8.  Survival Analysis of Patient Contraceptive Choice Method at Time of Abortion - Honolulu, Hawai'i, May 2010-December 2016.

Authors:  Kristen Valencia; Ghazaleh Moayedi; Shandhini Raidoo; Reni Soon; Bliss Kaneshiro; Mary Tschann
Journal:  Hawaii J Health Soc Welf       Date:  2020-09-01

9.  Contraceptive Counseling in Clinical Settings: An Updated Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lauren B Zapata; Karen Pazol; Christine Dehlendorf; Kathryn M Curtis; Nikita M Malcolm; Rachel B Rosmarin; Brittni N Frederiksen
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Right conclusion, wrong method.

Authors:  Vance W Berger
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.