| Literature DB >> 16750800 |
Polly E Bijur1, Anick Bérard, David Esses, Jordan Nestor, Clyde Schechter, E John Gallagher.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The purpose of the present study was to prospectively investigate the extent to which emergency providers base their decisions about pain management of suspected long-bone fracture on patient's self-reported pain intensity. Of 100 long-bone fracture patients presenting to 2 inner-city emergency departments, 69% received opioids as compared to 30% of 110 patients without long-bone fracture (RR = 2.3; 95% CI 1.6 to 3.1). After stratification by pain ratings on a validated self-reported numerical rating scale, fracture patients remained twice as likely to receive opioids as those without fracture (RR = 2.0; 95% CI 1.5 to 2.7). Similarly, multivariate adjustment for self-reported pain intensity had little effect on the observed association (RR = 2.1; 95% CI 1.6 to 2.8). We conclude that emergency providers do not primarily base their decisions about pain management of suspected long-bone fractures on patient self-reporting of pain intensity. PERSPECTIVE: This article addresses the question of the role of self-reported pain intensity rating on the treatment of suspected fractures. The findings indicate that self-reported pain is not used as the most important measure of pain as recommended by expert panels. We speculate this may contribute to oligoanalgesia in the Emergency Department.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16750800 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.01.451
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pain ISSN: 1526-5900 Impact factor: 5.820