Literature DB >> 16750770

Medpor alternative for microtia repair.

Thomas Romo1, Paul M Presti, Haresh R Yalamanchili.   

Abstract

Autologous costal cartilage has been the material of choice for framework in auricular reconstruction. However, the advent of porous high-density polyethylene (Medpor) has provided an effective alternative in microtia repair. A ready-to-use allopastic material, Medpor has distinguished itself from other implants via its durability, tensile strength, biocompatibility, and malleability. Results from clinical experience and bench research support this claim. When using this material, the authors noted impressive results with low associated morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16750770     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsc.2006.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am        ISSN: 1064-7406            Impact factor:   1.918


  10 in total

1.  Co-culture of adipose-derived stem cells and chondrocytes on three-dimensionally printed bioscaffolds for craniofacial cartilage engineering.

Authors:  Robert J Morrison; Hassan B Nasser; Khaled N Kashlan; David A Zopf; Derek J Milner; Colleen L Flanangan; Matthew B Wheeler; Glenn E Green; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Injectable and photopolymerizable tissue-engineered auricular cartilage using poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate copolymer hydrogels.

Authors:  Anestis Papadopoulos; David A Bichara; Xing Zhao; Shinichi Ibusuki; Mark A Randolph; Kristi S Anseth; Michael J Yaremchuk
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Clinical effect evaluation and complication analysis of different auricle reconstruction of congenital microtia.

Authors:  Min Wang; Zhirong Xiao; Min Huang; Jun Xie; Guangliang Liu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 4.  Auricular reconstruction from rib to 3D printing.

Authors:  Chelsea L Reighard; Scott J Hollister; David A Zopf
Journal:  J 3D Print Med       Date:  2017-12-15

5.  Computer aided-designed, 3-dimensionally printed porous tissue bioscaffolds for craniofacial soft tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  David A Zopf; Anna G Mitsak; Colleen L Flanagan; Matthew Wheeler; Glenn E Green; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Scaffold-Assisted Artificial Hair Implantation in a Rat Model.

Authors:  Joshua K Au; Miguel Fernando Palma Diaz; Tara Aghaloo; Maie A St John
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.611

Review 7.  Three-Dimensional Bioprinting Scaffolding for Nasal Cartilage Defects: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba; Ana Aiastui; Iago González-Fernández; Raquel Hernáez-Moya; Claudia Rodiño; Alba Delgado; Juan P Garces; Jacobo Paredes-Puente; Javier Aldazabal; Xabier Altuna; Ander Izeta
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 4.169

8.  Biochemical properties of tissue-engineered cartilage.

Authors:  Andrew K Pappa; Montserrat Caballero; Robert G Dennis; Matthew D Skancke; Roger J Narayan; John P Dahl; John A van Aalst
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.046

9.  Reconstruction of Congenital Microtia and Anotia: Analysis of Practitioner Epidemiology and Postoperative Outcomes.

Authors:  Nicholas G Cuccolo; Myrthe J Zwierstra; Ahmed M S Ibrahim; Abbas Peymani; Salim Afshar; Samuel J Lin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-06-19

10.  The Utility of Smartphone 3D Scanning, Open-Sourced Computer-aided Design, and Desktop 3D Printing in the Surgical Planning of Microtia Reconstruction: a Step by Step Guide and Concept Assessment.

Authors:  Abdualziz Alazzam; Sultan Aljarba; Feras Alshomer; Bassam Alawirdhi
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2021-06-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.