Literature DB >> 16750638

Neuromuscular fatigue differs with biofeedback type when performing a submaximal contraction.

Nicolas Place1, Alain Martin, Yves Ballay, Romuald Lepers.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine alterations in contractile and neural processes in response to an isometric fatiguing contraction performed with EMG feedback (constant-EMG task) when exerting 40% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) torque with the knee extensor muscles. A task with a torque feedback (constant-torque task) set at a similar intensity served as a reference task. Thirteen men (26+/-5 yr) attended two experimental sessions that were randomized across days. Endurance time was greater for the constant-EMG task compared with the constant-torque task (230+/-156 s vs. 101+/-32s, P<0.01). Average EMG activity for the knee extensor muscles increased from 33.5+/-4.5% to 54.7+/-21.7% MVC EMG during the constant-torque task (P<0.001), whereas the torque exerted during the constant-EMG task decreased from 42.8+/-3.0% to 17.9+/-5.6% MVC torque (P<0.001). Comparable reductions in knee extensors MVC (-15.7+/-8.7% for the constant-torque task vs. -17.5+/-9.8% for the constant-EMG task, P>0.05) and voluntary activation level were observed at exhaustion. In contrast, excitation-contraction coupling process, assessed with an electrically evoked twitch and doublet, was altered significantly more at the end of the constant-EMG task despite the absence of M-wave changes for both tasks. Present results suggest that prolonged contractions using EMG biofeedback should be used cautiously in rehabilitation programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16750638     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  8 in total

1.  The type of visual biofeedback influences maximal handgrip strength and activation strategies.

Authors:  Philémon Marcel-Millet; Philippe Gimenez; Alain Groslambert; Gilles Ravier; Sidney Grospretre
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Determinants, analysis and interpretation of the muscle compound action potential (M wave) in humans: implications for the study of muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Javier Rodriguez-Falces; Nicolas Place
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Muscle fatigue: from observations in humans to underlying mechanisms studied in intact single muscle fibres.

Authors:  Nicolas Place; Takashi Yamada; Joseph D Bruton; Håkan Westerblad
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  The sustainability of VO2max: effect of decreasing the workload.

Authors:  Véronique Billat; Hélène Petot; Jason R Karp; Guillaume Sarre; R Hugh Morton; Laurence Mille-Hamard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  Endurance time is joint-specific: a modelling and meta-analysis investigation.

Authors:  Laura A Frey Law; Keith G Avin
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Are There Critical Fatigue Thresholds? Aggregated vs. Individual Data.

Authors:  Daria Neyroud; Bengt Kayser; Nicolas Place
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Alterations of Neuromuscular Function after the World's Most Challenging Mountain Ultra-Marathon.

Authors:  Jonas Saugy; Nicolas Place; Guillaume Y Millet; Francis Degache; Federico Schena; Grégoire P Millet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effect of electrical stimulation on motor nerve regeneration in sciatic nerve ligated-mice.

Authors:  Farzaneh Samiee; Mohammad-Reza Zarrindast
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2017-09-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.