Literature DB >> 16750552

Equiblur zones at the fovea and near retinal periphery.

Bin Wang1, Kenneth J Ciuffreda, Trevor Irish.   

Abstract

Knowledge regarding successive blur discrimination thresholds (i.e., equiblur zones) in depth and across the near retinal periphery, and their relation to blur detection (i.e., depth-of-focus), remains unknown. The blur detection threshold and four successive blur discrimination thresholds were measured psychophysically at the fovea, as well as at retinal eccentricities of 0.25 degrees , 2 degrees , 4 degrees , and 8 degrees . A Badal optometer system was used to assess blur sensitivity monocularly in five visually normal young adults with cycloplegia. The foveal test stimulus consisted of a small irregularly shaped black form, and the peripheral test stimulus consisted of high contrast circular apertures of different radii. Both the group mean blur detection and successive blur discrimination thresholds progressively increased with retinal eccentricity. At retinal eccentricities of 0 degrees , 0.25 degrees , 2 degrees , 4 degrees , and 8 degrees , the group mean blur detection thresholds were 0.53+/-0.06 D, 0.59+/-0.10 D, 0.93+/-0.11 D, 0.98+/-0.16D, and 1.25+/-0.25 D, while the average values of the group mean blur discrimination thresholds across the steps were 0.29+/-0.01 D, 0.37+/-0.01 D, 0.48+/-0.00 D, 0.51+/-0.01 D, and 0.72+/-0.02 D, respectively. At each retinal eccentricity, the blur discrimination thresholds were similar to each other, and they were approximately 60% of the blur detection threshold magnitude. These findings provide a conceptual representation of blur perception throughout the central visual field. Possible mechanisms are proposed for the decreased blur sensitivity in the near retinal periphery, as well as for the difference between the blur detection and blur discrimination thresholds.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16750552     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  6 in total

1.  Dioptric defocus maps across the visual field for different indoor environments.

Authors:  Miguel García García; Arne Ohlendorf; Frank Schaeffel; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Blur Adaptation to Central Retinal Disease.

Authors:  Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  The utility of defocus blur in binocular depth perception.

Authors:  Dhanraj Vishwanath
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-08-22

4.  The natural statistics of blur.

Authors:  William W Sprague; Emily A Cooper; Sylvain Reissier; Baladitya Yellapragada; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Blur perception throughout the visual field in myopia and emmetropia.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Lenna Walker; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The blur horopter: Retinal conjugate surface in binocular viewing.

Authors:  Agostino Gibaldi; Vivek Labhishetty; Larry N Thibos; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.