Literature DB >> 16750295

Focused hypnotic analgesia: local and remote effects.

Yair Sharav1, Michael Tal.   

Abstract

Suggestion for hypnotic analgesia aimed at a specific body area is termed "focused hypnotic analgesia". It is not clear, however, whether this analgesia is limited to a specific body location or spread all over the body. Focused hypnotic analgesia was studied, in response to ascending electrical stimuli, when analgesia and stimulation were applied to the same area (local), and when analgesia was applied to one location and stimulation was delivered to a different area (remote). The face or leg served alternately as the local or remote areas, and the effect was tested in 12 high-hypnotizable (HH) and 13 low-hypnotizable (LH) subjects. Hypnotic analgesia in the local site produced a significant pain reduction compared to the remote site in HH subjects (P<0.0001) but not in LH subjects (P=0.68). As stimuli increased in intensity the reduction in pain as a result of hypnosis was larger both in HH and LH subjects (P<0.0001). Nevertheless, significant analgesia occurred in the 3 highest intensities in the local and remote location of HH subjects, but only in 2 highest intensities in the local and 1 in the remote of LH subjects. We conclude that in HH subjects focused hypnotic analgesia is mostly confined to the area aimed at, but some spread of analgesia to remote areas cannot be dismissed all together. Alternatively, this "spread" of analgesia could be due to a placebo effect in the remote area. Focused hypnotic analgesia requires increased attention to the body area aimed at, unlike analgesia achieved by distraction of attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16750295     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  3 in total

1.  Hypnotic relaxation results in elevated thresholds of sensory detection but not of pain detection.

Authors:  Sybille Kramer; Rolf Zims; Michael Simang; Linda Rüger; Dominik Irnich
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.659

2.  Hypnotizability and Placebo Analgesia in Waking and Hypnosis as Modulators of Auditory Startle Responses in Healthy Women: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Vilfredo De Pascalis; Paolo Scacchia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Pain modulation in waking and hypnosis in women: event-related potentials and sources of cortical activity.

Authors:  Vilfredo De Pascalis; Vincenzo Varriale; Immacolata Cacace
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.