Literature DB >> 16750257

Delivery outcome after cold-knife conization of the uterine cervix.

Philipp Klaritsch1, Olaf Reich, Albrecht Giuliani, Karl Tamussino, Josef Haas, Raimund Winter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk for preterm delivery and obstetric complications in women with prior cold-knife conization.
METHODS: In a retrospective study, we compared 76 deliveries of 65 women with prior cold-knife conization with the remaining 29,711 singleton deliveries at our institution between 1992 and 2002.
RESULTS: We found significant shorter duration of pregnancies in the conization group. Delivery prior to 37 weeks was found in 22.4% (n = 17) of the conization group and in 6.6% (n = 1961) of the controls (OR = 4.07 [2.22-7.10], P < 0.001). Preterm premature rupture of the membranes was found in 17.1% (n = 13) of the conization group and in 2.6% (n = 775) of the controls (OR = 7.70 [3.87-14.21], P < 0.001). Birth weight less than 2500 g was found in 18.4% (n = 14) of the conization group and in 7.7% (n = 2280) of the controls (OR = 2.72 [1.40-4.92], P = 0.002). Overall, birth weight in the conization group was not significantly lower (median 3147 g vs. 3287 g, P = 0.115). Cervical tears were found more frequently in the conization group (8.8% [n = 6] vs. 1.3% [n = 236], OR = 7.53 [2.63-17.57], P < 0.001). There was no difference in mode of delivery, duration of labor, head circumference, chorioamnionitis and use of oxytocin.
CONCLUSION: Cold-knife conization is a risk factor for preterm birth and preterm premature rupture of the membranes and seems to be a risk factor for cervical tears.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16750257     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  6 in total

1.  Pregnancy outcome after cervical conization: risk factors for preterm delivery and the efficacy of prophylactic cerclage.

Authors:  Ka Hyun Nam; Ja Young Kwon; Young-Han Kim; Yong-Won Park
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.401

2.  Analysis of pathological and clinical characteristics of cervical conization according to age group in Japan.

Authors:  Isao Murakami; Akiko Ohno; Masae Ikeda; Hiroshi Yamashita; Mikio Mikami; Yoichi Kobayashi; Satoru Nagase; Masatoshi Yokoyama; Takayuki Enomoto; Hidetaka Katabuchi
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-10-08

Review 3.  Vaginal progesterone vs. cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix, previous preterm birth, and singleton gestation: a systematic review and indirect comparison metaanalysis.

Authors:  Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero; Kypros Nicolaides; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; John M O'Brien; Elcin Cetingoz; Eduardo da Fonseca; George Creasy; Priya Soma-Pillay; Shalini Fusey; Cetin Cam; Zarko Alfirevic; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Risk of cesarean delivery after loop electrosurgical excision procedure.

Authors:  Heather A Frey; Molly J Stout; Anthony O Odibo; David M Stamilio; Alison G Cahill; Kimberly A Roehl; George A Macones
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Pregnancy Outcomes after Treatment for Cervical Cancer Precursor Lesions: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Sheila Weinmann; Allison Naleway; Geeta Swamy; Girishanthy Krishnarajah; Bhakti Arondekar; Jovelle Fernandez; Evan Myers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maria Kyrgiou; Antonios Athanasiou; Maria Paraskevaidi; Anita Mitra; Ilkka Kalliala; Pierre Martin-Hirsch; Marc Arbyn; Phillip Bennett; Evangelos Paraskevaidis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-07-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.