Literature DB >> 16749298

Aligning financial incentives with quality of care in the hospital setting.

John T Berthiaume1, Richard S Chung, Kira L Ryskina, Jim Walsh, Antonio P Legorreta.   

Abstract

This article describes the structure, implementation, and early results of a performance-based hospital incentive program designed by a large nonprofit health plan. The Hospital Quality Service and Recognition program, developed by the Hawaii Medical Service Association, was launched in 2001 to reward high-quality medical care at the hospital level. This pay-for-performance program used administrative claims data, survey data, and hospital-reported information to assess hospital performance in risk-adjusted complications and risk-adjusted length of stay (LOS), patient satisfaction, and hospital processes of care measures. Financial incentives were provided to participating hospitals based on their performance on these measures. Preliminary outcomes of the program evaluated over a 4-year period after implementation revealed improvements in aggregated rates of risk-adjusted surgical complications and efficiency of care as evidenced by a substantial decrease in risk-adjusted average LOS for several surgical procedures. Quality improvement was demonstrated in several other program components including emergency department satisfaction. This quality incentive program offers an innovative approach for encouraging delivery of high-quality and service-oriented care in a statewide network of participating hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16749298     DOI: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2006.tb00601.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Healthc Qual        ISSN: 1062-2551            Impact factor:   1.095


  6 in total

Review 1.  Health resource variability in the achievement of optimal performance and clinical outcome in ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Partha Sardar; Amartya Kundu; Ramez Nairooz; Saurav Chatterjee; Gary S Ledley; Wilbert S Aronow
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Performance contracting and quality improvement in outpatient treatment: effects on waiting time and length of stay.

Authors:  Maureen T Stewart; Constance M Horgan; Deborah W Garnick; Grant Ritter; A Thomas McLellan
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2012-03-23

Review 3.  Do penalty-based pay-for-performance programs improve surgical care more effectively than other payment strategies? A systematic review.

Authors:  Kyung Mi Kim; Wendy Max; Justin S White; Susan A Chapman; Ulrike Muench
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-25

4.  Pay for performance for hospitals.

Authors:  Tim Mathes; Dawid Pieper; Johannes Morche; Stephanie Polus; Thomas Jaschinski; Michaela Eikermann
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-05

5.  Improving the management of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: systematic evaluation of a quality improvement programme European QUality Improvement Programme for Acute Coronary Syndrome: the EQUIP-ACS project protocol and design.

Authors:  Marcus D Flather; Jean Booth; Daphne Babalis; Hector Bueno; Philippe G Steg; Grzegorz Opolski; Filippo Ottani; Jacques Machecourt; Alfredo Bardaji; Mats Bojestig; Anthony R Brady; Bertil Lindahl
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 6.  Do cardiology quality measures actually improve patient outcomes?

Authors:  Paula Chatterjee; Karen E Joynt
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 5.501

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.