Literature DB >> 1674277

Comparison of DNA double-strand break rejoining as measured by pulsed field gel electrophoresis, neutral sucrose gradient centrifugation and non-unwinding filter elution in irradiated plateau-phase CHO cells.

G Iliakis1, D Blöcher, L Metzger, G Pantelias.   

Abstract

The initial (up to 30 min) rate of DNA double-strand break (dsb) rejoining was measured in irradiated plateau-phase CHO cells, in a set of parallel experiments using the same cell suspension, by means of non-unwinding filter elution, neutral sucrose gradient centrifugation, and two pulsed-field gel electrophoresis assays: asymmetric field inversion gel electrophoresis (AFIGE) and clamped homogeneous electric field (CHEF) gel electrophoresis. The rate of DNA dsb rejoining was compared to the rate of rejoining of chromatin breaks measured, also in the same cell population, using the technique of premature chromosome condensation (PCC). Two radiation exposures, 25 Gy and/or 50 Gy, were used and applied to the individual parts of the experiments according to the sensitivity of the assay under investigation. Similar values for the initial rate of DNA dsb rejoining were obtained with all assays used, with t 1/2 ranging between 10 and 12 min after exposure to 25 Gy and between 15 and 20 min after exposure to 50 Gy. The initial rate of rejoining of chromatin breaks was slower than that of DNA dsb and occurred with t 1/2 of 87 min. The results suggest that all major techniques currently used for assaying rejoining of DNA dsb give similar results despite their widely different biophysical basis, and indicate that more information is required before a direct correlation between rejoining of DNA dsb and rejoining of chromatin breaks can be established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1674277     DOI: 10.1080/09553009114550821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  8 in total

1.  Distribution of DNA fragment sizes after irradiation with ions.

Authors:  E Gudowska-Nowak; K Psonka-Antończyk; K Weron; T Elsässer; G Taucher-Scholz
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 1.890

Review 2.  Choosing the right path: does DNA-PK help make the decision?

Authors:  Jessica A Neal; Katheryn Meek
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 3.  Mechanisms of induction and repair of DNA double-strand breaks by ionizing radiation: some contradictions.

Authors:  U Hagen
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Repair of x-ray-induced DNA double-strand breaks in specific Not I restriction fragments in human fibroblasts: joining of correct and incorrect ends.

Authors:  M Löbrich; B Rydberg; P K Cooper
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Detection of heavy-ion-induced DNA double-strand breaks using static-field gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  G Taucher-Scholz; J Heilmann; M Schneider; G Kraft
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  The use of a double-marker shuttle vector to study DNA double-strand break repair in wild-type and radiation-sensitive mutants of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  B Jha; F Ahne; F Eckardt-Schupp
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.886

7.  Effects of CRISPR/Cas9 dosage on TICAM1 and RBL gene mutation rate, embryonic development, hatchability and fry survival in channel catfish.

Authors:  Ahmed Elaswad; Karim Khalil; Zhi Ye; Zhanjiang Liu; Shikai Liu; Eric Peatman; Ramjie Odin; Khoi Vo; David Drescher; Kamal Gosh; Guyu Qin; William Bugg; Nathan Backenstose; Rex Dunham
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Mechanistic Modeling of Dose and Dose Rate Dependences of Radiation-Induced DNA Double Strand Break Rejoining Kinetics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Igor Shuryak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.