Literature DB >> 1674265

Wound infection under occlusive dressings.

J J Hutchinson1, J C Lawrence.   

Abstract

It is often supposed that occlusive dressings potentiate wound infection. However, even though heavy colonization by skin and wound flora is often seen under certain types of occlusion, clinical infection is not a frequent occurrence. Commensal wound flora consists of a variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms and fungi which do not appear to be detrimental to healing. Certain aspects of wound healing may in fact be promoted by bacterial colonization, although clinical infection can lead to wound breakdown and systemic infection. Wounds compromised by devitalized tissue, drains or sutures are more susceptible than clean wounds to clinical infection. Occlusive dressings may help prevent infection by presenting a barrier to potential pathogens, and hydrocolloid occlusive dressings have been shown to prevent dissemination of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The rate of clinical infection as deduced from published trials of dressings is lower under occlusion than when non-occlusive dressings are used, and this is likely to be a result of normal activity of the host defences under occlusive dressings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1674265     DOI: 10.1016/0195-6701(91)90172-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  25 in total

Review 1.  Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management.

Authors:  P G Bowler; B I Duerden; D G Armstrong
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Postoperative care of the facial laceration.

Authors:  Nicholas Medel; Neeraj Panchal; Edward Ellis
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2010-12

Review 3.  Development of an evidence-based protocol for care of pilonidal sinus wounds healing by secondary intent using a modified reactive Delphi procedure. Part one: the literature review*.

Authors:  Connie L Harris; Samantha Holloway
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  Dressings and topical agents for treating pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Maggie J Westby; Jo C Dumville; Marta O Soares; Nikki Stubbs; Gill Norman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-22

5.  Eusol.

Authors:  D J Leaper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-04-11

6.  Comparison of bacteria-retaining ability of absorbent wound dressings.

Authors:  Masahiro Tachi; Shinichi Hirabayashi; Yoshiyuki Yonehara; Yasutoshi Suzuki; Philip Bowler
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 7.  The use of gauze: will it ever change?

Authors:  Vanessa J Jones
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 8.  Evolution or revolution? Adapting to complexity in wound management.

Authors:  Keith Harding; David Gray; John Timmons; Theresa Hurd
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Wound management: the occlusive dressing.

Authors:  S B Rheinecker
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Treatment options for postoperatively infected abdominal wall wounds healing by secondary intention.

Authors:  Julia Mees; Wolf Arif Mardin; Norbert Senninger; Matthias Bruewer; Daniel Palmes; Soeren Torge Mees
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.