BACKGROUND: Suboptimal CD4+ T cell recovery during antiretroviral therapy (ART) is a common clinical dilemma. METHODS: We analyzed viral and immunologic predictors of CD4+ T cell recovery in 116 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected subjects who had suppressed viremia (< or = 50 copies/mL) while receiving ART. Successive measurements of T cell immunophenotypes and cellular HIV-1 DNA levels were obtained before and during receipt of ART. On the basis of increases in the CD4+ T cell count, subjects were classified as immunologically concordant (demonstrating an increase of > or = 100 CD4+ T cells/mm3) or discordant (demonstrating an increase of <100 CD4+ T cells/mm3) after 48 weeks of ART. RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, CD4+ and CD8+ T cell activation at baseline was negatively associated with immunologic concordance at week 48 of ART (odds ratio [OR], 0.80 [P = .04] and 0.67 [P = .02], respectively). High memory (CDRA(-)CD62L-) CD8+ T cell counts at baseline (OR, 0.33 [P = .05]) predicted less CD4+ T cell recovery, whereas increased naive CD4+ T cell counts were associated with higher increases in CD4+ T cells (OR, 1.19 [P = .052]). Neither the cell-associated HIV-1 DNA level at baseline (P = .32) nor the cell-associated HIV-1 DNA level at week 48 of ART (P = .42) was associated with immunologic concordance during ART. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the potential clinical usefulness of the baseline determination of immune activation and maturation subsets in the prediction of CD4+ T cell recovery during viral suppression. Furthermore, identification of individuals with reduced potential for CD4+ T cell recovery during ART may provide a rationale for the initiation of early therapy for some patients.
BACKGROUND: Suboptimal CD4+ T cell recovery during antiretroviral therapy (ART) is a common clinical dilemma. METHODS: We analyzed viral and immunologic predictors of CD4+ T cell recovery in 116 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected subjects who had suppressed viremia (< or = 50 copies/mL) while receiving ART. Successive measurements of T cell immunophenotypes and cellular HIV-1 DNA levels were obtained before and during receipt of ART. On the basis of increases in the CD4+ T cell count, subjects were classified as immunologically concordant (demonstrating an increase of > or = 100 CD4+ T cells/mm3) or discordant (demonstrating an increase of <100 CD4+ T cells/mm3) after 48 weeks of ART. RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, CD4+ and CD8+ T cell activation at baseline was negatively associated with immunologic concordance at week 48 of ART (odds ratio [OR], 0.80 [P = .04] and 0.67 [P = .02], respectively). High memory (CDRA(-)CD62L-) CD8+ T cell counts at baseline (OR, 0.33 [P = .05]) predicted less CD4+ T cell recovery, whereas increased naive CD4+ T cell counts were associated with higher increases in CD4+ T cells (OR, 1.19 [P = .052]). Neither the cell-associated HIV-1 DNA level at baseline (P = .32) nor the cell-associated HIV-1 DNA level at week 48 of ART (P = .42) was associated with immunologic concordance during ART. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the potential clinical usefulness of the baseline determination of immune activation and maturation subsets in the prediction of CD4+ T cell recovery during viral suppression. Furthermore, identification of individuals with reduced potential for CD4+ T cell recovery during ART may provide a rationale for the initiation of early therapy for some patients.
Authors: Julie A Terwee; Jennifer K Carlson; Wendy S Sprague; Kerry S Sondgeroth; Sarah B Shropshire; Jennifer L Troyer; Sue VandeWoude Journal: Virology Date: 2008-05-22 Impact factor: 3.616
Authors: Peter W Hunt; Huyen L Cao; Conrad Muzoora; Isaac Ssewanyana; John Bennett; Nneka Emenyonu; Annet Kembabazi; Torsten B Neilands; David R Bangsberg; Steven G Deeks; Jeffrey N Martin Journal: AIDS Date: 2011-11-13 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Allan R Tenorio; Hongyu Jiang; Yu Zheng; Barbara Bastow; Daniel R Kuritzkes; John A Bartlett; Steven G Deeks; Alan L Landay; Sharon A Riddler Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Eleanor M P Wilson; Amrit Singh; Katherine Huppler Hullsiek; Dave Gibson; W Keith Henry; Ken Lichtenstein; Nur F Önen; Erna Kojic; Pragna Patel; John T Brooks; Irini Sereti; Jason V Baker Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Christopher H Woelk; Nadejda Beliakova-Bethell; Miguel Goicoechea; Yingdong Zhao; Pinyi Du; Steffney E Rought; Jean Lozach; Josué Pérez-Santiago; Douglas D Richman; Davey M Smith; Susan J Little Journal: AIDS Date: 2010-01-16 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Adriana Weinberg; Ruth Dickover; Paula Britto; Chengcheng Hu; Julie Patterson-Bartlett; Joyce Kraimer; Howard Gutzman; William T Shearer; Mobeen Rathore; Ross McKinney Journal: AIDS Date: 2008-11-12 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Xinyan Zhang; Peter W Hunt; Scott M Hammer; Michelle S Cespedes; Kristine B Patterson; Ronald J Bosch Journal: HIV Clin Trials Date: 2013 Mar-Apr