Literature DB >> 16740871

Meadow, Southall, and the General Medical Council of the United kingdom.

David L Chadwick1, Henry F Krous, Desmond K Runyan.   

Abstract

In this article we address the recent actions of the General Medical Council in the United Kingdom affecting 2 pediatricians who are major contributors to pediatric knowledge about the intentional suffocation of infants. The General Medical Council struck one of them from the register of licensed medical practitioners, but the decision was appealed successfully. The council restricted the practice of the other pediatrician. After a review of the transcripts of the hearings, we conclude that the opinions given by both doctors were responsible, and the transcripts suggest that the conduct of the hearings was unfair. Licensing boards may have difficulty in competently regulating doctors' expert testimony, at least in cases involving child maltreatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16740871     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-0429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  3 in total

1.  Are children really safeguarded in the UK health service?

Authors:  C Graham
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 2.  The jigsaw of child protection.

Authors:  Heather Payne
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Nonaccidental trauma: clinical aspects and epidemiology of child abuse.

Authors:  Christopher J Hobbs; Robert A C Bilo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-02-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.