Literature DB >> 16740868

Quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in cerebral palsy.

Heidi Anttila1, Antti Malmivaara, Regina Kunz, Ilona Autti-Rämö, Marjukka Mäkelä.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In conducting reviews on the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions on children with cerebral palsy, the assessment of trials can be hampered by problems in reporting. Therefore, we set out to evaluate trial reporting by using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement recommendations.
METHODS: Randomized, controlled trials published in 1990 or later were identified in literature searches for reviews on the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions on children with cerebral palsy. Two independent reviewers evaluated the trial reporting by using a modified 33-item Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials checklist.
RESULTS: We identified 15 randomized, controlled trials. Almost half (48%) of the applicable items were reported adequately. Inadequate reporting was found in the following items: outcome measures, sample-size determination, details of the sequence generation, allocation concealment and implementation of the randomization, success of assessor blinding, recruitment and follow-up dates, intention-to-treat analysis, precision of the effect size, co-interventions, and adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: Only a small number of sufficiently reported trials were found. Because nearly all items had been described in at least 1 article, high-quality reporting seems feasible. Assessment of trials depends on appropriate reporting, and poor reporting jeopardizes judgments on the clinical implications. Authors of randomized, controlled trials are encouraged to follow the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials criteria. There is a clear need to improve the quality of reporting of trials in this field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16740868     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-1630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  21 in total

1.  Trends in the methodological quality of published randomized controlled trials on antibacterial agents.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Eleni I Pitsouni; Ioannis A Bliziotis
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Is research quality in orthopedic manual therapy trials stagnating? Reflections and pathways for improving research quality and advance our profession.

Authors:  Sean P Riley; Brian T Swanson; Steven F Sawyer; Jean-Michel Brismée
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-12

Review 3.  Enhancing primary reports of randomized controlled trials: Three most common challenges and suggested solutions.

Authors:  Guowei Li; Meha Bhatt; Mei Wang; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Zainab Samaan; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Systematic review of randomized controlled trial quality in pediatric kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Robert J Brooks; Gail Y Higgins; Angela C Webster
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed.

Authors:  Sally Hopewell; Susan Dutton; Ly-Mee Yu; An-Wen Chan; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-23

6.  Hidden Empirical Research Ethics: A Review of Three Health Journals from 2005 through 2006.

Authors:  James M Dubois; Rebecca L Volpe; Erica K Rangel
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Randomized controlled trials of malaria intervention trials in Africa, 1948 to 2007: a descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Vittoria Lutje; Annette Gerritsen; Nandi Siegfried
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 2.979

Review 8.  Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.

Authors:  Lucy Turner; Larissa Shamseer; Douglas G Altman; Laura Weeks; Jodi Peters; Thilo Kober; Sofia Dias; Kenneth F Schulz; Amy C Plint; David Moher
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14

Review 9.  Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review.

Authors:  Lucy Turner; Larissa Shamseer; Douglas G Altman; Kenneth F Schulz; David Moher
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-29

10.  Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research.

Authors:  David Moher; Iveta Simera; Kenneth F Schulz; John Hoey; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.