Literature DB >> 16740828

Variation in the use of intracranial-pressure monitoring and mortality in critically ill children with meningitis in the United States.

Folafoluwa O Odetola1, John M Tilford, Matthew M Davis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to describe patient and hospital characteristics associated with the use of intracranial pressure monitors and outcomes in critically ill children with meningitis.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of children 0 to 17 years of age hospitalized with meningitis and requiring mechanical ventilation using the 1997 and 2000 Kids' Inpatient Database. We generated national estimates of rates of intracranial pressure monitoring and in-hospital mortality by patient and hospital characteristics, and compared in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay, and total charges for children who received an intracranial pressure monitor with those who did not.
RESULTS: There were an estimated 1067 and 1170 hospitalizations nationally for childhood meningitis requiring mechanical ventilation in 1997 and 2000, respectively. Most (79%) of the hospitalizations involved infants. Overall, intracranial-pressure monitors were used in 7% of hospitalizations for meningitis, with the highest rates in children aged 5 to 17 years and lowest rates in children <1 year. In-hospital mortality was 19.6%, highest in children aged 5 to 17 years and in children with pneumococcal infections. In multivariate regression analyses, intracranial pressure monitor use was positively associated with age, patient volume, and hospitals located in the West census region. In-hospital mortality was associated with increasing age, hospitalization in the year 2000, self-pay/other insurance status, and pneumococcal meningitis. There was no difference in hospital mortality associated with use of intracranial pressure monitors, but both length of stay and log-transformed total hospital charges were significantly higher in the group that received an intracranial-pressure monitor.
CONCLUSION: Intracranial pressure monitoring for the treatment of critically ill children with meningitis varies by census region, the number of cases treated, and patient age. The use of intracranial pressure monitoring was not statistically associated with mortality in this national sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16740828     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-2179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  8 in total

1.  Meningococcal meningitis.

Authors:  Ricardo G Branco; Robert C Tasker
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Raised intracranial pressure during CNS infection: what should we do about it?*.

Authors:  Robert C Tasker
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  The Burden of Pediatric Neurocritical Care in the United States.

Authors:  Cydni N Williams; Juan Piantino; Cynthia McEvoy; Nora Fino; Carl O Eriksson
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 3.372

4.  Variation in intracranial pressure monitoring and outcomes in pediatric traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Tellen D Bennett; Jay Riva-Cambrin; Heather T Keenan; E Kent Korgenski; Susan L Bratton
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2012-07-01

5.  Burden of bacterial meningitis: a retrospective review on laboratory parameters and factors associated with death in meningitis, kelantan malaysia.

Authors:  Rehana Basri; Abdel Rahman Zueter; Zeehaida Mohamed; Mohammad Khursheed Alam; Bachok Norsa'adah; Siti Asma Hasan; Habsah Hasan; Fadzilah Ahmad
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.131

6.  Non-invasive estimation of cerebral perfusion pressure using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in children with severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Nicole F O'Brien; Marlina E Lovett; Melissa Chung; Tensing Maa
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Variation in lumbar punctures for early onset neonatal sepsis: a nationally representative serial cross-sectional analysis, 2003-2009.

Authors:  Stephen W Patrick; Robert E Schumacher; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 2.125

8.  Cross-sectional comparison of critically ill pediatric patients across hospitals with various levels of pediatric care.

Authors:  Brian D Benneyworth; William E Bennett; Aaron E Carroll
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-11-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.