PURPOSE: To improve risk prediction in neuroblastoma and to specify the type of a possible relapse, alterations in the long arm of chromosome 11 were analyzed. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A representative cohort of 611 neuroblastomas was investigated for deletion events in distal chromosome 11q using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. RESULTS: Alterations in 11q were found in 159 of 611 tumors in the whole cohort (26%) and were associated with stage 4 disease (P < 0.001) and age at diagnosis of >2.5 years (P < 0.001). Event-free survival and overall survival were significantly poorer for patients with 11q loss in the whole cohort (event-free survival and overall survival, P < 0.001) and in different subsets: neuroblastoma without MYCN amplification (MNA) (event-free survival and overall survival, P < 0.001), with MNA (event-free survival, P = 0.03; overall survival, P = 0.02), and MYCN-nonamplified stage 1, 2, 3, and 4S tumors with and without del 1p (event-free survival and overall survival, P < 0.001). In stage 4, the 11q status did not discriminate outcome. By multivariate analysis, the 11q status proved prognostic for event-free survival in the whole cohort (P = 0.008; hazard ratio, 1.573) and in the subgroup of stages 1, 2, 3, and 4S without MNA (P < 0.001; hazard ratio, 3.534). Moreover, 11q alterations were strongly correlated with the occurrence of metastatic relapses (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In addition to the current risk stratification, the status of 11q enables the identification of patients with an increased risk for relapses in general and metastatic relapses in particular.
PURPOSE: To improve risk prediction in neuroblastoma and to specify the type of a possible relapse, alterations in the long arm of chromosome 11 were analyzed. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A representative cohort of 611 neuroblastomas was investigated for deletion events in distal chromosome 11q using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. RESULTS: Alterations in 11q were found in 159 of 611 tumors in the whole cohort (26%) and were associated with stage 4 disease (P < 0.001) and age at diagnosis of >2.5 years (P < 0.001). Event-free survival and overall survival were significantly poorer for patients with 11q loss in the whole cohort (event-free survival and overall survival, P < 0.001) and in different subsets: neuroblastoma without MYCN amplification (MNA) (event-free survival and overall survival, P < 0.001), with MNA (event-free survival, P = 0.03; overall survival, P = 0.02), and MYCN-nonamplified stage 1, 2, 3, and 4S tumors with and without del 1p (event-free survival and overall survival, P < 0.001). In stage 4, the 11q status did not discriminate outcome. By multivariate analysis, the 11q status proved prognostic for event-free survival in the whole cohort (P = 0.008; hazard ratio, 1.573) and in the subgroup of stages 1, 2, 3, and 4S without MNA (P < 0.001; hazard ratio, 3.534). Moreover, 11q alterations were strongly correlated with the occurrence of metastatic relapses (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In addition to the current risk stratification, the status of 11q enables the identification of patients with an increased risk for relapses in general and metastatic relapses in particular.
Authors: Yania Yáñez; Elena Grau; Silvestre Oltra; Adela Cañete; Francisco Martínez; Carmen Orellana; Rosa Noguera; Sarai Palanca; Victoria Castel Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2011-06-25 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Dorian R A Swarts; Sandra M H Claessen; Yvonne M H Jonkers; Robert-Jan van Suylen; Anne-Marie C Dingemans; Wouter W de Herder; Ronald R de Krijger; Egbert F Smit; Frederik B J M Thunnissen; Cornelis A Seldenrijk; Aryan Vink; Aurel Perren; Frans C S Ramaekers; Ernst-Jan M Speel Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2011-07-16 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Denah R Taggart; Wendy B London; Mary Lou Schmidt; Steven G DuBois; Tom F Monclair; Akira Nakagawara; Bruno De Bernardi; Peter F Ambros; Andrew D J Pearson; Susan L Cohn; Katherine K Matthay Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Clare J Twist; Arlene Naranjo; Mary Lou Schmidt; Sheena C Tenney; Susan L Cohn; Holly J Meany; Peter Mattei; E Stanton Adkins; Hiroyuki Shimada; Wendy B London; Julie R Park; Katherine K Matthay; John M Maris Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Roberta Vitali; Camillo Mancini; Vincenzo Cesi; Barbara Tanno; Marta Piscitelli; Mariateresa Mancuso; Fabiola Sesti; Emanuela Pasquali; Bruno Calabretta; Carlo Dominici; Giuseppe Raschellà Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2009-12-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Eva Villamón; Marta Piqueras; Carlos Mackintosh; Javier Alonso; Enrique de Alava; Samuel Navarro; Rosa Noguera Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2008-06-24 Impact factor: 4.064