Literature DB >> 16740111

An illustration of issues in factor extraction and identification of dimensionality in psychological assessment data.

Michael F Steger1.   

Abstract

Structural validity has long been regarded as critical to psychological measurement. However, in practical application, issues central to structural validity are often neglected. The purpose of this study was to illustrate the importance of several crucial choices that face researchers attempting to evaluate the structure of data from a given scale. In this study, I compared the structural solutions derived via principal components analysis and principal axis factoring using eigenvalues, scree plots, and traditional parallel analyses with data from the Purpose in Life Test (Crumbaugh & Maholick, 1964). I discuss the importance of structural validity for overall construct validity and the importance of carefully considering factor analytic methodology. I provide recommendations for uses of factor analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16740111     DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8603_03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Assess        ISSN: 0022-3891


  13 in total

1.  The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures.

Authors:  R Nathan Spreng; Margaret C McKinnon; Raymond A Mar; Brian Levine
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2009-01

2.  Sources of Response Bias in Older Ethnic Minorities: A Case of Korean American Elderly.

Authors:  Miyong T Kim; Ju-Young Lee; Jisook Ko; Hyunwoo Yoon; Kim B Kim; Yuri Jang
Journal:  J Cross Cult Gerontol       Date:  2015-09

3.  The hierarchical structure of self-reported impulsivity.

Authors:  Kris N Kirby; Julia C Finch
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2010-04

4.  Italian validation of the Purpose In Life (PIL) test and the Seeking Of Noetic Goals (SONG) test in a population of cancer patients.

Authors:  C Brunelli; E Bianchi; L Murru; P Monformoso; M Bosisio; L Gangeri; G Miccinesi; M Scrignaro; C Ripamonti; C Borreani
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Development and validation of a multidimensional questionnaire for evaluating quality of life in melasma (HRQ-melasma).

Authors:  Camila Fernandes Pollo; Luciane Donida Bartoli Miot; Silmara Meneguin; Hélio Amante Miot
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.896

6.  Psychometrican analysis and dimensional structure of the Brazilian version of melasma quality of life scale (MELASQoL-BP).

Authors:  Camila Fernandes Pollo Maranzatto; Hélio Amante Miot; Luciane Donida Bartoli Miot; Silmara Meneguin
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.896

7.  Comparing the Effects of Different Smoothing Algorithms on the Assessment of Dimensionality of Ordered Categorical Items with Parallel Analysis.

Authors:  Rudolf Debelak; Ulrich S Tran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Resilience measurement in later life: a systematic review and psychometric analysis.

Authors:  T D Cosco; A Kaushal; M Richards; D Kuh; M Stafford
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Assessing quality of life in older adults: psychometric properties of the OPQoL-brief questionnaire in a nursing home population.

Authors:  Gørill Haugan; Jorunn Drageset; Beate André; Kamile Kukulu; James Mugisha; Britt Karin S Utvær
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 10.  Conceptualising and operationalising resilience in older adults.

Authors:  Theodore D Cosco; Almar Kok; Andrew Wister; Kenneth Howse
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2019-03-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.