Literature DB >> 16739975

Evaluation of Mut+ and MutS Pichia pastoris phenotypes for high level extracellular scFv expression under feedback control of the methanol concentration.

Itzcoatl A Pla1, Leonardo M Damasceno, Todd Vannelli, Gerd Ritter, Carl A Batt, Michael L Shuler.   

Abstract

Extracellular secretion of over 4 g x L(-1) of the A33 scFv antibody fragment was achieved in Pichia pastoris at the 10 L bioreactor scale using minimal medium and feedback control of the methanol concentration. Since methanol acts as both inducer and carbon source, its close regulation is a crucial factor in achieving optimal fermentation conditions. The antibody fragment production levels of both Mut+ and MutS phenotypes were compared in a bioreactor under closed-loop PID control of the methanol level. As expected, the MutS phenotype has a growth rate lower than that of the Mut+ (0.37 vs 1.05 d(-1)) when growing under methanol. However, protein productivity and cell yield on substrate are almost double that of the Mut+ (18.2 vs 9.3 mg A33 sc per gram of methanol). Induction at wet cell weight of 350 g x L(-1) for the MutS also has a positive effect on the final product concentration. Both Mut+ and MutS phenotypes reach a maximum biomass density around 450 g x L(-1) wet cell weight, independent of methanol concentration, reactor scale, or induction density. This reactor configuration allows for reproducible fermentation schemes with different Pichia pastoris phenotypes with AOX promoters, without prior knowledge of the culture growth parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16739975     DOI: 10.1021/bp060012+

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Prog        ISSN: 1520-6033


  8 in total

1.  Strains and Molecular Tools for Recombinant Protein Production in Pichia pastoris.

Authors:  Claudia Rinnofner; Michael Felber; Harald Pichler
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 2.  Carbon metabolism influenced for promoters and temperature used in the heterologous protein production using Pichia pastoris yeast.

Authors:  Andrea B Zepeda; Adalberto Pessoa; Jorge G Farías
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 2.476

3.  High-level production of recombinant HBcAg virus-like particles in a mathematically modelled P. pastoris GS115 Mut+ bioreactor process under controlled residual methanol concentration.

Authors:  Emils Bolmanis; Oskars Grigs; Andris Kazaks; Vytautas Galvanauskas
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.434

4.  Quantitative comparison of dynamic physiological feeding profiles for recombinant protein production with Pichia pastoris.

Authors:  Oliver Spadiut; Denes Zalai; Christian Dietzsch; Christoph Herwig
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Recombinant protein expression in Pichia pastoris strains with an engineered methanol utilization pathway.

Authors:  Florian W Krainer; Christian Dietzsch; Tanja Hajek; Christoph Herwig; Oliver Spadiut; Anton Glieder
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 5.328

6.  An artificial neural network for membrane-bound catechol-O-methyltransferase biosynthesis with Pichia pastoris methanol-induced cultures.

Authors:  Augusto Q Pedro; Luís M Martins; João M L Dias; Maria J Bonifácio; João A Queiroz; Luís A Passarinha
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.328

7.  Integration event induced changes in recombinant protein productivity in Pichia pastoris discovered by whole genome sequencing and derived vector optimization.

Authors:  Jan-Philipp Schwarzhans; Daniel Wibberg; Anika Winkler; Tobias Luttermann; Jörn Kalinowski; Karl Friehs
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 5.328

8.  Pichia pastoris Mut(S) strains are prone to misincorporation of O-methyl-L-homoserine at methionine residues when methanol is used as the sole carbon source.

Authors:  Peter Schotte; Isabelle Dewerte; Manu De Groeve; Saskia De Keyser; Veronique De Brabandere; Patrick Stanssens
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 5.328

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.