Literature DB >> 16739333

Clinicopathological properties of poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma of the stomach: comparison of solid- and non-solid-types.

Chikara Kunisaki1, Hirotoshi Akiyama, Masato Nomura, Goro Matsuda, Yuichi Otsuka, Hidetaka Andrew Ono, Yutaka Nagahori, Masazumi Takahashi, Fumihiko Kito, Hiroshi Shimada.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinicopathological and biological properties of the poorly-differentiated types of gastric carcinoma (solid-type and non-solid-type). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,558 patients with primary gastric adenocarcinomas were enrolled in this study. The surgical results were compared.
RESULTS: Patients with non-solid-type tumors tended to be younger females with peritoneal or lymph node metastases and lymphatic invasion, and with tumors that were ill-defined, of larger diameter and deeper. Those patients with differentiated tumors tended to have the opposite characteristics of those patients with non-solid-type tumors. Patients with solid-type tumors had intermediate characteristics. The survival in patients with non-solid-type tumors was poor compared to those with differentiated or solid-type tumors. There was a significant difference in the survival of stage III tumors with either solid- or non-solid-type tumors (p=0.0480).
CONCLUSION: Therapeutic strategies should be based on the histological type of the tumor in patients with poorly-differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16739333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  7 in total

1.  Tumor progression by epithelial-mesenchymal transition in ARID1A- and SMARCA4-aberrant solid-type poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Taisuke Sasaki; Kenichi Kohashi; Shinichiro Kawatoko; Eikichi Ihara; Eiji Oki; Masafumi Nakamura; Yoshihiro Ogawa; Yoshinao Oda
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of poorly cohesive cell subtype of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kenichi Nakamura; Kojiro Eto; Shiro Iwagami; Katsuhiro Ogawa; Hiroshi Sawayama; Takatsugu Ishimoto; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Yoshifumi Baba; Yuji Miyamoto; Naoya Yoshida; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Vasculogenic mimicry: a new prognostic sign of gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Man Li; Yanjun Gu; Zhiguang Zhang; Shiwu Zhang; Danfang Zhang; Ali F Saleem; Xiulan Zhao; Baocun Sun
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Endothelial cell-specific molecule-1: a potential serum marker for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Zhongchuan Lv; Yongsheng Fan; Hongbing Chen; Dawei Zhao
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-07-24

5.  Solid-type poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the stomach: Deficiency of mismatch repair and SWI/SNF complex.

Authors:  Shinichi Tsuruta; Kenichi Kohashi; Yuichi Yamada; Minako Fujiwara; Yutaka Koga; Eikichi Ihara; Yoshihiro Ogawa; Eiji Oki; Masafumi Nakamura; Yoshinao Oda
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 6.716

6.  LGR5 expression is associated with prognosis in poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Takehito Ehara; Takeshi Uehara; Tomoyuki Nakajima; Yasuhiro Kinugawa; Shota Kobayashi; Mai Iwaya; Hiroyoshi Ota; Yuji Soejima
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  A novel nomogram for predicting survival of patients with poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaolu Zhou; Zhiyuan Dong; Chenjing Zhang; Xiaoge Geng; Lunan Li; Jiyong Jing; Wensheng Pan; Haifang Lou
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.