Literature DB >> 16738860

Sugar concentrations along and across the Ricinus communis L. hypocotyl measured by single cell sampling analysis.

Jutta Verscht1, Deri Tomos, Ewald Komor.   

Abstract

Single cell sap sampling and analysis were used to measure the longitudinal and radial distribution of sucrose, glucose and fructose in the apical cell division zone and in the basal, elongated zone of the Ricinus hypocotyl. Sucrose and hexose increased in concentration from the apex to the base of the seedling axis. In the cell division zone low hexose and sucrose concentrations prevailed in cortex and pith, with a slightly higher hexose concentration in pith cells. The sucrose concentrations in sieve tubes and in phloem were much higher than in the cortex and pith cells. In the basal zone of the hypocotyl high levels of sucrose in phloem, cortex and pith were found, therefore radial, diffusional sucrose flow away from the phloem was considered unlikely. It is proposed that radial flow of growth-water to the hypocotyl periphery together with the down-regulation of a sucrose transporter at the phloem leads to a preferential sucrose flow to the expanding cortex. The pith cells, which do not experience flow of growth-water, are probably insufficiently supplied with sucrose from the phloem resulting eventually in cell death as the plant grows. Shortage of sucrose supply, experimentally achieved by removal of the endosperm, led to sucrose hydrolysis in the pith. The sucrose levels in the other tissues decreased less. It appears that the hydrolysis to hexose was initiated to maintain the osmotic value in the pith cell sap. It is speculated that high hexose levels in the cells are indicative of insufficient sucrose supply via the phloem and that the pith cells are confronted with that situation during early seedling development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16738860     DOI: 10.1007/s00425-006-0309-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Planta        ISSN: 0032-0935            Impact factor:   4.116


  14 in total

1.  Plant histochemistry by correlation peak imaging.

Authors:  A Metzler; M Izquierdo; A Ziegler; W Köckenberger; E Komor; M von Kienlin; A Haase; M Décorps
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  THE PRESSURE PROBE: A Versatile Tool in Plant Cell Physiology.

Authors:  A. Deri Tomos; Roger A. Leigh
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1999-06

3.  Phloem loading in Ricinus cotyledons: sucrose pathways via the mesophyll and the apoplasm.

Authors:  G Orlich; E Komor
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  Sinks--integral parts of a whole plant.

Authors:  J F Farrar
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.992

5.  Phloem loading--not metaphysical, only complex: towards a unified model of phloem loading.

Authors:  E Komor; G Orlich; A Weig; W Köckenberger
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.992

6.  Membrane Transport in Isolated Vesicles from Sugarbeet Taproot : II. Evidence for a Sucrose/H-Antiport.

Authors:  D P Briskin; W R Thornley; R E Wyse
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Nonvascular, Symplasmic Diffusion of Sucrose Cannot Satisfy the Carbon Demands of Growth in the Primary Root Tip of Zea mays L.

Authors:  M. S. Bret-Harte; W. K. Silk
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Carbohydrates in individual cells of epidermis, mesophyll, and bundle sheath in barley leaves with changed export or photosynthetic rate

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Sucrose transport in tonoplast vesicles of red beet roots is linked to ATP hydrolysis.

Authors:  H P Getz
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.116

10.  Solute distribution between vacuole and cytosol of sugarcane suspension cells: Sucrose is not accumulated in the vacuole.

Authors:  J Preisser; H Sprügel; E Komor
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.