Literature DB >> 1673880

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of histamine H2-receptor antagonists. Relationship between intrinsic potency and effective plasma concentrations.

J H Lin1.   

Abstract

Histamine H2-receptor antagonists are a unique class of compounds. Pharmacologically they are characterised as a family by their ability to inhibit the secretion of gastric acid, and kinetically they are classified as a family by their similarity in absorption, distribution and elimination. All the H2-receptor antagonists exhibit classical competitive drug-receptor interactions, with Schild slope parameters not significantly different from unity. Comparison of the values of the negative logarithm of the molar concentration of antagonist in the presence of which the potency of the agonist is reduced 2-fold (PA2) indicates that famotidine is about 20 to 50 times more potent than cimetidine and 6 to 10 times more potent than ranitidine. To date, famotidine is the most potent among marketed H2-receptor antagonists. Oral absorption of all the H2-receptor antagonists under clinical investigation is fairly rapid. Peak plasma concentrations are usually attained within 1 to 3h after the dose, but a second peak after oral administration has been observed with cimetidine, ranitidine, famotidine, ramixotidine and etintidine. The mean oral bioavailability for the H2-antagonists ranges from 50 to 70%. Reports on the plasma profiles after intravenous administration are available only for cimetidine, ranitidine, famotidine and nizatidine: plasma concentrations of all 4 decline in a biexponential manner. All of the H2-antagonists are eliminated quite rapidly, with a terminal half-life of 1 to 3h and a total body clearance of 24 to 48 L/h. Elimination is mainly attributable to renal excretion, with renal clearances ranging from 13.8 to 30 L/h. As the values for renal clearance greatly exceed the glomerular filtration rate (6 to 7.2 L/h), it is apparent that renal tubular secretion plays an important role. There is a simple, direct correlation between plasma concentrations of H2-receptor antagonists and the inhibition of gastric acid secretion. This implies a rapid equilibration between drug concentration in plasma and at the site of action, and a reversible drug-receptor interaction. Success in correlating the plasma concentration of H2-receptor antagonists and their pharmacological effects stems from reliable and precise measurement of both items. Despite the heterogeneous nature of data sources, 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for cimetidine, ranitidine, famotidine, nizatidine, etintidine and roxatidine obtained in vitro appear to be in good agreement with those determined in vivo. These results suggest that at an early stage of development of an H2-receptor antagonist, IC50 determined from in vitro studies may be useful as a first approximation to predict the clinically effective concentration of the new agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1673880     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199120030-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  100 in total

Review 1.  Prostaglandins, H2-receptor antagonists and peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  P Bright-Asare; T Habte; B Yirgou; J Benjamin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Pharmacokinetics of roxatidine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  J D Collins; A W Pidgen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Classification and biological distribution of histamine receptor sub-types.

Authors:  N Chand; P Eyre
Journal:  Agents Actions       Date:  1975-10

4.  Ranitidine (AH 19065): a new potent, selective histamine H2-receptor antagonist [proceedings].

Authors:  J Bradshaw; R T Brittain; J W Clitherow; M J Daly; D Jack; B J Price; R Stables
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Comparison of bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of cimetidine in subjects with normal and impaired renal function.

Authors:  D R Guay; G R Matzke; H N Bockbrader; J Dancik
Journal:  Clin Pharm       Date:  1983 Mar-Apr

6.  Effect of mifentidine on histamine-stimulated human atrium "in vitro": comparison with ranitidine and cimetidine.

Authors:  E Poli; D Medici; G A Contini; G Bertaccini
Journal:  Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther       Date:  1985-02

7.  Nomogram for drug dosage adjustment in patients with renal failure.

Authors:  T D Bjornsson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral nizatidine.

Authors:  R Vargas; J Ryan; F G McMahon; G Regel; W W Offen; C Matsumoto
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.126

9.  Cimetidine clearance and bioavailability in hepatic cirrhosis.

Authors:  J Sonne; H E Poulsen; M Døssing; N E Larsen; P B Andreasen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Renal excretion of cimetidine.

Authors:  I M Weiner; L Roth
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Improving the prediction of the brain disposition for orally administered drugs using BDDCS.

Authors:  Fabio Broccatelli; Caroline A Larregieu; Gabriele Cruciani; Tudor I Oprea; Leslie Z Benet
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  Comparative Effectiveness of Proton Pump Inhibitors vs Histamine Type 2 Receptor Blockers for Preventing Clinically Important Gastrointestinal Bleeding During Intensive Care: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Craig M Lilly; Mohammad Aljawadi; Omar Badawi; Ebere Onukwugha; Sarah E Tom; Laurence S Magder; Ilene Harris
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Inhibition and induction of cytochrome P450 and the clinical implications.

Authors:  J H Lin; A Y Lu
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Improvement of paracellular transport in the Caco-2 drug screening model using protein-engineered substrates.

Authors:  Rebecca L DiMarco; Daniel R Hunt; Ruby E Dewi; Sarah C Heilshorn
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Modulation of the tight junctions of the Caco-2 cell monolayers by H2-antagonists.

Authors:  L S Gan; S Yanni; D R Thakker
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 6.  Switching drug availability from prescription only to over-the-counter status. Are elderly patients at increased risk?

Authors:  S I Benrimoj; J H Langford; M G Bowden; E J Triggs
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Comparison of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses.

Authors:  N L Dayneka; V Garg; W J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1993-08

8.  Ferrous sulfate reduces cimetidine absorption.

Authors:  N R Campbell; B B Hasinoff; J B Meddings; W D Anderson; S Robertson; K Granberg
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  Population-based mechanistic prediction of oral drug absorption.

Authors:  Masoud Jamei; David Turner; Jiansong Yang; Sibylle Neuhoff; Sebastian Polak; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Geoffrey Tucker
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 4.009

10.  Concentration-dependent effects of polyethylene glycol 400 on gastrointestinal transit and drug absorption.

Authors:  Julia D R Schulze; Wendy A Waddington; Peter J Eli; Gary E Parsons; Mark D Coffin; Abdul W Basit
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.